Cited by 187Neural Networks and ApplicationsNeural dynamics and brain functionUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 138 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Neural Networks in Computational Neuroscience

Kietzmann, Tim C, McClure, Patrick, Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus·2019·Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The goal of computational neuroscience is to find mechanistic explanations of how the nervous system processes information to give rise to cognitive function and behavior. At the heart of the field are its models, that is, mathematical and computational descriptions of the system being studied, which map sensory stimuli to neural responses and/or neural to behavioral responses. These models range from simple to complex. Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) have come to dominate several domains of artificial intelligence (AI). As the term “neural network” suggests, these models are inspired by biological brains. However, current DNNs neglect many details of biological neural networks. These simplifications contribute to their computational efficiency, enabling them to perform complex feats of intelligence, ranging from perceptual (e.g., visual object and auditory speech recognition) to cognitive tasks (e.g., machine translation), and on to motor control (e.g., playing computer games or controlling a robot arm). In addition to their ability to model complex intelligent behaviors, DNNs excel at predicting neural responses to novel sensory stimuli with accuracies well beyond any other currently available model type. DNNs can have millions of parameters, which are required to capture the domain knowledge needed for successful task performance. Contrary to the intuition that this renders them into impenetrable black boxes, the computational properties of the network units are the…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.013.46

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 140 references

Research works printed but not linked: 117

  1. 2014, ArXiv Preprint
  2. Frontiers in Psychology
  3. 2005, Journal of Vision
  4. 2011, PLoS Computational Biology
  5. 2017, BioRxiv
  6. 2014, PLoS Computational Biology
  7. 2011, Current Biology
  8. 2016, NeuroImage
  9. 2016, ArXiv Preprint
  10. 2014, Nature Neuroscience
  11. 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  12. 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  13. 2017, PLoS Computational Biology
  14. 2008, NeuroImage
  15. 2016, NeuroImage
  16. 2012, Science
  17. 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology
  18. 2018, ArXiv Preprint
  19. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
  20. 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  21. 1991, Neural Computation
  22. 2007, PLoS Computational Biology
  23. 2011, Nature Neuroscience
  24. 2010, Science
  25. 2018, NeuroImage
  26. 1980, Biological Cybernetics
  27. 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology
  28. 2017, ArXiv Preprint
  29. 2015, ArXiv Preprint
  30. 2014, PLoS Computational Biology
  31. 2015, Journal of Neuroscience
  32. 2017, ELife
  33. 2016, Disentangling the representation of identity from head view., Cerebral Cortex
  34. 2015, Cortex
  35. 2006, Science
  36. 1997, Neural Computation
  37. 2016, Nature Neuroscience
  38. 1959, Journal of Physiology
  39. 2016, Training spiking deep networks for neuromorphic hardware., ArXiv Preprint
  40. 2012, Neuron
  41. 1987, Journal of Neurophysiology
  42. 2008, Nature
  43. 2001, Artificial Neural Networks—ICANN
  44. 2003, Neural Computation
  45. 2017, Journal of Mathematical Psychology
  46. 2014, PLoS Computational Biology
  47. 2016, Scientific Reports
  48. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
  49. 2016, NeuroImage
  50. 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  51. 2012, Journal of Neuroscience
  52. 2004, Journal of Neurophysiology
  53. 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  54. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
  55. 2016, PLoS Computational Biology
  56. 2014, ArXiv Preprint
  57. 2015, Nature
  58. 2017, Current Biology
  59. 2001, Nature Neuroscience
  60. 2008, Science
  61. 2010, Neuron
  62. 2016, ArXiv Preprint
  63. 2016, Nature Communications
  64. 2018, Neurdiness—Thinking about Brains
  65. 2016, ArXiv Preprint
  66. 2018, BioRxiv
  67. 2015, Journal of Neuroscience
  68. 2016, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
  69. 2005, Cerebral Cortex
  70. Mehrer, J., Kietzmann, T. C., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2017). Deep neural networks trained on ecologically relevant categories better explain human IT. In Cognitive Computational Neuroscience Meeting (Vol. 1, pp. 1–2).
  71. 2008, Science
  72. 2015, Nature
  73. Frontiers in Psychology
  74. 2011, NeuroImage
  75. 2015, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  76. 2014, PLoS Computational Biology
  77. 2017, Distill
  78. 1996, Nature
  79. 2005, Neural Computation
  80. 2016, Arxiv Preprint
  81. 2016, Neuron
  82. 1996, Neural Computation
  83. 2017, Neural Networks
  84. 2018, BioRxiv
  85. 2013, International Conference on Learning Representations
  86. 1999, Nature Neuroscience
  87. 2017, ArXiv Preprint
  88. 1998, Nature
  89. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
  90. 1986, Nature
  91. 2016, ArXiv Preprint
  92. Nature Reviews Neuroscience
  93. 2015, ArXiv Preprint
  94. 2016, PLoS Computational Biology
  95. 2017, ELife
  96. 2015, ArXiv Preprint
  97. 1999, Nature
  98. 2014, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  99. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  100. 1989, What details of neural circuits matter?, Seminars in the Neurosciences
  101. 2016, ArXiv Preprint
  102. 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  103. 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  104. Frontiers in Psychology
  105. 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  106. 1997, Progress in Neurobiology
  107. 2016, Journal of Vision
  108. 2009, Journal of Neuroscience
  109. 2010, PloS One
  110. 2002, Neural Computation
  111. 2006, Annual Review of Neuroscience
  112. 2016, ArXiv Preprint
  113. 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  114. Frontiers in Psychology
  115. 2006, PLoS Biology
  116. 2003, Neural Computation
  117. 2016, Nature Neuroscience

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–187 of 187

Metadata

Authors
Kietzmann, T. C., McClure, P., & Kriegeskorte, N.
Affiliations
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Venue
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience
Published
2019-01-25
OpenAlex
W2611715315
Cited by
186
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 21
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Education › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
deep neural network, computational neuroscience, neural network model, neural response prediction, sensory stimuli, network structure, learning algorithms, input statistics, network visualization, neural representations, black-box interpretability, artificial intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review