Authentic Assessment
Abstract
Authentic tasks replicate real-world challenges and standards of performance that experts or professionals typically face in the field. The term “authentic assessment” was first coined by Grant Wiggins in K‒12 educational contexts. Authentic assessment is an effective measure of intellectual achievement or ability because it requires students to demonstrate their deep understanding, higher-order thinking, and complex problem solving through the performance of exemplary tasks. Hence authentic assessment can serve as a powerful tool for assessing students’ 21st-century competencies in the context of global educational reforms. The review begins with a detailed explanation of the concept of authentic assessment. There is a substantial body of literature focusing on the definitions of authentic assessment. However, only those that are original and relevant to educational contexts are included.. Some of the criteria for authentic assessment defined by the authors overlap with each other, but their definitions are consistent. A comparison of authentic assessment and conventional assessment reveals that different purposes are served, as evidenced by the nature of the assessment and item response format. Examples of both types of assessments are included. Three major themes are examined within authentic assessment research in educational contexts: authentic assessment in educational or school reforms, teacher professional learning and development in authentic assessment, and authenti…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authentic assessments are inherently performance-based, requiring students to construct extended responses, complete tasks, or produce tangible products.
“Authentic assessments are inherently performance-based, requiring students to construct extended responses, complete tasks, or produce tangible products (Koh, 2017).”
From Designing experiential learning activities with generative artificial intelligence tools for authentic assessment (2024) · cites this paper as Koh, 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 3 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Koh, K. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Koh, Kim H
- ORCID
- Koh, Kim H
- Venue
- Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 2017-02-27
- OpenAlex
- W4256288777
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- authentic assessment, performance-based assessment, 21st century skills, assessment for learning, teacher learning, educational reform, higher education assessment, K-12 education, assessment literacy, teacher professional development, critical inquiry, teacher learning communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review