Dietary Interventions for Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Gastroparesis (Gp) is a delay in gastric emptying in the absence of a mechanical obstruction and has the capacity to cause symptoms that significantly impact a patient's quality of life. Dietary interventions are the first-line treatment in Gp, but the efficacy of different diets is unclear. This systematic review seeks to determine the effectiveness of dietary interventions on clinical outcomes in Gp. A literature search of MEDLINE Ovid from 1 March 2008 to 1 October 2021 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies that reported dietary interventions in Gp. From the initial search, 2789 studies resulted. These were assessed by 2 independent reviewers and selected based on the primary outcomes of interest: changes in symptom-specific patient-reported outcomes and changes in gastric emptying time. A third reviewer resolved any discrepancies. Six adult studies (185 subjects) met the inclusion criteria, whereas no pediatric study did. Five of the included studies were randomized controlled trials and one was an observational study. The systematic review suggested low-fat diets, small-particle diets, diets with isoflavones, and foods considered bland, starchy, sweet, and salty did not exacerbate Gp symptoms. Small-particle diets and diets with isoflavones were found to improve gastric emptying time in patients. Additionally, small-particle diets were shown to reduce anxiety in comparison to large-particle diets. Of the randomized controlled trials, 80% were low risk of bias and 20% were fair risk of bias. The observational study was considered fair quality. The data presented in this review suggest specific dietary interventions could potentially improve Gp symptoms and gastric emptying in adult patients, particularly low-fat and small-particle diets. For pediatric Gp, data are lacking. The limited data available highlights a critical gap in the literature.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Liquid or homogenized foods are better tolerated than solids.
“Liquid or homogenized foods, which are better tolerated than solids [105, 108, 115, 116];”
From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [116]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says dietary intervention is first-line treatment for gastroparesis, and the Outcomes section proposes assessing symptom improvement after dietary changes. Neither reports that liquid or homogenized foods are better tolerated than solids. Searches for that comparison and for small-particle or liquid diets found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDietary fat and insoluble fiber delay gastric emptying and exacerbate symptoms.
“Low‑fat and low‑fiber diets, as dietary fat and insoluble fiber delay gastric emptying and exacerbate symptoms [105, 108, 115, 116];”
From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [116]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says dietary intervention is a first-line treatment for gastroparesis, and the Objectives list symptoms and gastric emptying as outcomes to assess. Neither section says that dietary fat or insoluble fiber delays emptying or worsens symptoms; searches for those specific terms found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSmall, frequent meals (4-6 per day) reduce gastric distension and symptom burden.
“Small, frequent meals (4–6 per day) to reduce gastric distension and symptom burden [105, 115–117];”
From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [116]
The indexed copy’s Introduction (page unavailable) says dietary intervention is first-line treatment for gastroparesis, while its Objectives describe symptom reduction as an outcome to assess. Neither section reports that 4–6 small meals per day reduce gastric distension or symptoms; searches for meal frequency and distension found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Pasricha, P. J., Grover, M., Yates, K. P., Abell, T. L., Bernard, C. E., Koch, K. L., McCallum, R. W., Sarosiek, I., Kuo, B., Bulat, R., et al. (2021) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.01.230 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Self-citationOlausson, E. A., Störsrud, S., Grundin, H., Isaksson, M., Attvall, S., & Simrén, M. (2014) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.453 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Islam, Saleem. "Gastroparesis in Children." Current Opinion in Pediatrics, vol. 27, no. 3, 2015, pp. 377-382., doi:10.1097/mop.0000000000000216. · DOI
- Abell, T. L., et al. "Consensus Recommendations for Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy: A Joint Report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine." Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, vol. 36, no. 1, 2008, pp. 44-54., doi:10.2967/jnmt.107.048116. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nutritional challenges in patients with gastroparesis
Aguilar, A., Malagelada, C., & Serra, J. (2022) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0000000000000856 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices
Galeano, F., Tumminia, A., Oteri, V., Le Moli, R., Piticchio, T., Scilletta, S., Di Marco, M., Di Pino, A., & Frasca, F. (2026) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-026-04693-6
- Authors
- Eseonu, D., Su, T., Lee, K., Chumpitazi, B. P., Shulman, R. J., & Hernaez, R.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Texas Medical Center Library (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eseonu, Debra
- Venue
- Advances in Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1715-1724
- ISSN
- 2156-5376 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-8313
- PMC
- PMC9526854
- OpenAlex
- W4223929265
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Advances in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (U01 DK112194)
- USDA (58-3092-0-001)
- Agricultural Research Service (P30 DK56338)
- Texas Medical Center Digestive Disease Center
- Daffy's Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Keywords
- gastroparesis, dietary intervention, gastric emptying, low-fat diet, isoflavones, anxiety, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Humans, Isoflavones, Quality of Life, Gastroparesis, Observational Studies as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review