Cited by 119Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

A Perspective on the Transition to Plant-Based Diets: a Diet Change May Attenuate Climate Change, but Can It Also Attenuate Obesity and Chronic Disease Risk?

Open access
Magkos, Faidon, Tetens, Inge, Bügel, Susanne Gjedsted, Felby, Claus, Schacht, Simon Rønnow, Hill, James O, Ravussin, Eric, Astrup, Arne·2020·Advances in Nutrition

Abstract

Current dietary guidelines advocate more plant-based, sustainable diets on the basis of scientific evidence about diet-health relations but also to address environmental concerns. Here, we critically review the effects of plant-based diets on the prevalence of obesity and other health outcomes. Plant-based diets per se have limited efficacy for the prevention and treatment of obesity, but most have beneficial effects in terms of chronic disease risk. However, with the considerable possibilities of translating plant-based diets into various types of dietary patterns, our analysis suggests that potential adverse health effects should also be considered in relation to vulnerable groups of the population. A transition to more plant-based diets may exert beneficial effects on the environment, but is unlikely to affect obesity, and may also have adverse health effects if this change is made without careful consideration of the nutritional needs of the individual relative to the adequacy of the dietary intake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/advances/nmz090

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magkos, F., Tetens, I., Bügel, S. G., Felby, C., Schacht, S. R., Hill, J. O., Ravussin, E., & Astrup, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Magkos, Faidon
Venue
Advances in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 2156-5376 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8313
OpenAlex
W2972164222
Cited by
119
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK056336, P30DK079626)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
plant-based diet, sustainable diets, obesity, chronic disease risk, climate change mitigation, dietary guidelines, vulnerable populations, nutritional adequacy, dietary habits, environmental impact of diets
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Diet, Environment, Feeding Behavior, Food Supply, Humans, Nutritional Requirements, Obesity, Plants, Diet, Vegetarian, Nutrition Policy, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review