Cited by 25Ethics, Aesthetics, and ArtArt, Politics, and ModernismCritical Theory and Political Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Art as Political Discourse

Open access
Simoniti, Vid·2021·British Journal of Aesthetics

Abstract

Much art is committed to political causes. However, does art contribute something unique to political discourse, or does it merely reflect the insights of political science and political philosophy? Here I argue for indispensability of art to political discourse by building on the debate about artistic cognitivism, the view that art is a source of knowledge. Different artforms, I suggest, make available specific epistemic resources, which allow audiences to overcome epistemic obstacles that obtain in a given ideological situation. My goal is to offer a general model for identifying cognitive advantages for artworks belonging to distinct artforms and genres (e.g. satire, visibility-raising artworks, caricatures, and so on), in a way that can account for each artwork’s historical and cultural specificity. More speculatively, however, my account also comments on the ancient struggle between philosophy and the arts as competing modes of persuasion, and expands our notion of legitimate political discourse to include a greater plurality of discursive genres.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aesthj/ayab018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Atwood, 1985, The handmaid's tale
  2. Allen, 2012, ‘The unforced force of the better argument: Reason and power in Habermas’ political theory’, Constellations,, 19, 353, 10.1111/cons.12005 · DOI
  3. Benjamin, 1934, ‘The author as producer’,, 768
  4. Borat, 2006, Created by Sacha Baron Cohen
  5. Brand, 1990, The force of reason: An introduction to Habermas’ theory of communicative action
  6. Brüno, 2009, Created by Sacha Baron Cohen
  7. Camp, 2009, ‘Two varieties of literary imagination: Metaphor, fiction, and thought experiments’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy,, 33, 107, 10.1111/j.1475-4975.2009.00186.x · DOI
  8. Carroll, 2002, ‘The wheel of virtue: Art, literature, and moral knowledge’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,, 60, 3, 10.1111/1540-6245.00048 · DOI
  9. Cassam, 2019, Vices of the mind: From the intellectual to the political, 10.1093/oso/9780198826903.001.0001 · DOI
  10. Du Bois, 1926, ‘Criteria of Negro art’, The Crisis,, 32 (, 290
  11. Esma's secret: Grbavica, 2006, Directed by Jasmila Žbanić
  12. Gaarder, 2000, Sophie's world: A novel about the history of philosophy
  13. Gaut, 2007, Art, emotion and ethics., 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263219.001.0001 · DOI
  14. Goodin, 2018, ‘If deliberation is everything, maybe it’s nothing’,, 883
  15. Green, 2010, ‘How and what we can learn from fiction’,, 350, 10.1002/9781444315592.ch18 · DOI
  16. Griffin, 1994, Satire: A critical reintroduction.
  17. Habermas, 1970, ‘Knowledge and interest’,, 10.1007/978-1-349-15388-6_3 · DOI
  18. Habermas, 1984, The theory of communicative action, vol I: Reason and the rationalization of society
  19. Habermas, 1990, Moral consciousness and communicative action
  20. Habermas, 1996, Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy., 10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 · DOI
  21. I may destroy you, 2020, TV series. Created by Michaela Coel
  22. John, 1998, ‘Reading fiction and conceptual knowledge: philosophical thought in literary context’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,, 56, 331, 10.1111/1540_6245.jaac56.4.0331 · DOI
  23. Lamarque, 1994, Truth, fiction, and literature: A philosophical perspective.
  24. McKenna, 2019, ‘Irrelevant cultural influences on belief’, Journal of Applied Philosophy,, 36, 755, 10.1111/japp.12347 · DOI
  25. Nanay, 2013, ‘Philosophy versus literature? Against the discontinuity thesis’, 349
  26. Nussbaum, 1990, Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature
  27. Nyhan, 2010, ‘When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions’, Political Behavior,, 32, 303, 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Panagia, 2004, ‘The force of political argument’, Political Theory,, 32, 825, 10.1177/0090591704265729 · DOI
  29. Piper, 2013, Rationality and the structure of the self, Volume II: a Kantian conception.
  30. Plato, 2000, The Republic
  31. Polletta, 2018, ‘The forms of deliberative communication’,, 71
  32. Pose, 2018-21, TV series. Created by Ryan Murphy, Brad Falchuk and Steven Canals
  33. Public Enemy, 1990, Fear of a Black planet
  34. Putnam, 1978, ‘Literature, science, and reflectio, 83
  35. Rawls, 1997, ‘The idea of public reason revisited’, The Unviersity of Chicago Law Review,, 64, 765, 10.2307/1600311 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Rawls, 2005, Political liberalism.
  37. Rabelais, 2006, Gargantua and Pantagruel
  38. Said, 1978, Orientalism.
  39. Stanley, 2015, How propaganda works.
  40. Stebbing, 1939, Thinking to some purpose.
  41. South Park, 1997, TV series. Created by Trey Parker and Matt Stone
  42. Taylor, 2017, Black is beautiful: A philosophy of black aesthetics
  43. Team America: World police, 2004, Directed by Trey Parker
  44. Vallier, 2018, ‘Public justification’,
  45. Walton, 1990, Mimesis as make-believe: On the foundations of the representational arts
  46. Williamson, 2007, The philosophy of philosophy., 10.1002/9780470696675 · DOI
  47. Williamson, 2015, Tetralogue: I’m right, you’re wrong
  48. Zupančič, 2008, The odd one in: On comedy.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Simoniti, V.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Simoniti, Vid
Venue
British Journal of Aesthetics
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
559-574
ISSN
  • 0007-0904 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2842
OpenAlex
W3207976042
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
22.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Aesthetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Politics, and Modernism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
Keywords
art and politics, political discourse, art as knowledge, satire, caricature, persuasion, art and philosophy, discursive genres, ideology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Art as Political Discourse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aesthj/ayab018
The paper
Simoniti, V. (2021). Art as Political Discourse. British Journal of Aesthetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayab018