The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The roots of resilience: Exploring popular support for African traditional authorities
Abstract
African traditional authorities have proved to be highly resilient, remaining just as much a part of the ‘modern’ political landscape as any legislature or local council. Analysts draw sharply different conclusions as to whether this resilience is rooted in popular legitimacy, or whether it instead derives from either state sanction or state weakness. In short, the question is whether traditional authorities survive and thrive because of the preferences of the mass public, or only at the behest of the state, and in fact in opposition to the popular will. Data collected in 19 countries reveal an intensity of support for traditional authorities that challenges those who argue that these leaders are unwanted and undemocratic. While Africans find these leaders to be flawed, they enjoy widespread popular legitimacy, and most believe that traditional authorities have an important role to play in local governance. The public values the role traditional authorities play in managing and resolving conflict, and their leadership qualities and accessibility to ordinary people. Evidence also suggests that traditional leaders play an important symbolic role as representatives of community identity, unity, continuity, and stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colonialism and the Two Publics in Africa: A Theoretical Statement
Ekeh, P. P. (1975) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417500007659 · Cited by 1,508
Cited by
Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
HAGGARD, S., & KAUFMAN, R. R. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000287 · Cited by 300
Exploiting the Poor: Bureaucratic Corruption and Poverty in Africa
Justesen, M. K., & Bjørnskov, C. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.002 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, C.
- Venue
- African Affairs
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-06-27
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 448
- Pages
- 353-376
- ISSN
- 0001-9909 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2621
- OpenAlex
- W2039601976
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The roots of resilience: Exploring popular support for African traditional authorities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/afraf/adt025
- The paper
- Logan, C. (2013). The roots of resilience: Exploring popular support for African traditional authorities. African Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adt025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.