The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: Is it Suitable for use with Older Adults?
Abstract
An Anglicized version of the SF-36, a recently developed generic health status measure, was tested among people aged 65 years and over in hospital outpatient and general practice settings as both a self-completed and interview-administered instrument. The SF-36 was quick to complete, with 84% completed in 10 minutes or less (median time 8 minutes), while the distribution of scores provided further evidence of its sensitivity and validity. As an interview-administered instrument the SF-36 was acceptable among all age groups, although 32% of outpatients and 10% of general-practice patients, consisting predominantly of people aged 75 years and over with poor physical or mental health scores, felt unable to self-complete the questionnaire. In addition, 26% of respondents missed out at least one of the 36 statements, with missing items being significantly related to older age and self-completion. Missing responses were mainly concentrated on a small number of questions whose emphasis on work or vigorous activities meant that they were frequently regarded as not applicable by elderly people. Suggested modifications to these questions for elderly respondents are given. With these changes the SF-36 is regarded as suitable for use as a self-completed questionnaire among the younger age group of elderly people, although some assistance may often be required by people aged 75 years and over and especially those with poor physical or mental health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.
Fitzpatrick, Davey, Buxton, & Jones (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2140 · Cited by 1,715
El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos
Vilagut, G., Ferrer, M., Rajmil, L., Rebollo, P., Permanyer-Miralda, G., Quintana, J. M., Santed, R., Valderas, J. M., Ribera, A., Domingo-Salvany, A., et al. (2005) · Gaceta Sanitaria · doi:10.1157/13074369 · Cited by 831
Clark, F., Jackson, J., Carlson, M., Chou, C.-P., Cherry, B. J., Jordan-Marsh, M., Knight, B. G., Mandel, D., Blanchard, J., Granger, D. A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2009.099754 · Cited by 445
Determinants of health-related quality of life in elderly in Tehran, Iran
Tajvar, M., Arab, M., & Montazeri, A. (2008) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-323 · Cited by 356
Lamping, D. L., Constantinovici, N., Roderick, P., Normand, C., Henderson, L., Harris, S., Brown, E., Gruen, R., & Victor, C. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03123-8 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- HAYES, V., MORRIS, J., WOLFE, C., & MORGAN, M.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 120-125
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2051848879
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: Is it Suitable for use with Older Adults? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/24.2.120
- The paper
- HAYES, V., MORRIS, J., WOLFE, C., & MORGAN, M. (1995). The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: Is it Suitable for use with Older Adults? Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/24.2.120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.