The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research arm test in stroke patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Action Research arm test (ARAT) was constructed for assessing recovery of upper extremity function after cortical injury. The objective of the study was to verify the inter-rater reliability and validity of the ARAT in stroke patients. METHODS: 50 stroke patients participated in the study. For the purpose of inter-rater study, the ARAT was administered by three experienced raters on each patient within a 3-day period. Validity was assessed by comparing the patients' scores on the ARAT with those obtained for the other well-validated measurements evaluating upper extremity motor impairment and disability. RESULTS: Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total score was 0.98 indicating very high inter-rater reliability. ICCs were also very high in each of the subscales. The score of the ARAT was closely correlated with that of the upper extremity part of the motor assessment scale, the arm sub-score of the motricity index and the upper extremity movements of the modified motor assessment chart (Pearson r = 0.96, 0.87 and 0.94, respectively). CONCLUSION: The preliminary results of this study support the value of the ARAT for measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Cited by
Upper Extremity Use in People with Hemiparesis in the First Few Weeks After Stroke
Lang, C. E., Wagner, J. M., Edwards, D. F., & Dromerick, A. W. (2007) · Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/npt.0b013e31806748bd · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- HSIEH, C.-L., HSUEH, I.-P., CHIANG, F.-M., & LIN, P.-H.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-113
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2162567509
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
