Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visual problems and falls

Harwood, R. H.·2001·Age and Ageing

Abstract

Visual impairment is a risk factor for falls, on average approximately doubling falls risk in a wide variety of studies. Falls risk increases as visual impairment worsens. The relationship is almost certainly causal. Vision accounts for perhaps a quarter to a half of all falls, although this estimate is imprecise. Visual impairment in 70% or more of elderly people is remediable with relatively simple interventions (correcting refractive errors and cataract surgery), making it an important potential target for intervention at the population level. However, no intervention has yet been proven to reduce falls risk in a randomized controlled trial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/30.suppl_4.13

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Harwood, R. H.
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
30
Issue
suppl 4
Pages
13-18
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2151941975
Cited by
166
References
1
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual problems and falls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/30.suppl_4.13
The paper
Harwood, R. H. (2001). Visual problems and falls. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/30.suppl_4.13

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.