The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A systematic literature review of factors affecting outcome in older medical patients admitted to hospital
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: The ACMEplus project aims to devise a standardised system for measuring case-mix and outcome in older patients admitted to hospitals in different parts of Europe for primarily 'medical' (i.e. not surgical or psychiatric) reasons. As a first step in this project, a systematic review was carried out to identify factors which had a significant influence on outcome in such patients. METHODS: The systematic search used Medline 1966-2000, Cinahl 1982-2000, Web of Science 1981-2000, reference lists of relevant papers and a hand search of Age and Ageing 1974-2000. A six-category grading system was devised to classify the 313 identified papers with regard to their relevance to the ACMEplus project, study design and power. The analysis of the 14 'category 1' papers is presented. RESULTS: The main areas of assessment of case-mix were function, cognition, depression, illness severity, nutrition, social elements, aspects of diagnosis and demographic details. Statistically significant predictors, for the four outcome measures, listed below were: For length of stay: functional status score, illness severity, cognitive score, poor nutrition, comorbidity score, diagnosis or presenting illness, polypharmacy, age and gender. For mortality: functional status score, illness severity, cognitive score, comorbidity score, diagnosis or presenting illness, polypharmacy, age and gender. For discharge destination: functional status score, cognitive score, diagnosis or presenting illness and age. For readmission rate: functional status score, illness severity, co-morbidity, polypharmacy, diagnosis or presenting illness and age. CONCLUSIONS: Factors affecting outcome in older medical patients are complex. When looking at outcomes of hospital admission in older people it is important not just to look at routinely available statistics such as age, gender and diagnosis but also to take into account multifaceted aspects such as functional status and cognitive function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluation of the Quality of Prognosis Studies in Systematic Reviews
Hayden, J. A., Côté, P., & Bombardier, C. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010 · Cited by 1,452
Adverse Outcomes of Polypharmacy in Older People: Systematic Review of Reviews
Davies, L. E., Spiers, G., Kingston, A., Todd, A., Adamson, J., & Hanratty, B. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.10.022 · Cited by 544
Polypharmacy and Prescribing Quality in Older People
Steinman, M. A., Seth Landefeld, C., Rosenthal, G. E., Berthenthal, D., Sen, S., & Kaboli, P. J. (2006) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00889.x · Cited by 537
Dodd, J. W., Getov, S. V., & Jones, P. W. (2010) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00125109 · Cited by 426
Ligthart-Melis, G. C., Luiking, Y. C., Kakourou, A., Cederholm, T., Maier, A. B., & de van der Schueren, M. A. E. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.006 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, S. E., Seymour, D. G., & Primrose, W. R.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-115
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2140091841
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic literature review of factors affecting outcome in older medical patients admitted to hospital. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/afh036
- The paper
- Campbell, S. E., Seymour, D. G., & Primrose, W. R. (2004). A systematic literature review of factors affecting outcome in older medical patients admitted to hospital. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afh036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.