The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An outreach geriatric medication advisory service in residential aged care: a randomised controlled trial of case conferencing
Abstract
BACKGROUND: efficient strategies are needed to provide specialist advice in nursing homes to ensure quality medical care. We describe a case conference intervention involving a multidisciplinary team of health professionals. OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary case conferences on the appropriateness of medications and on patient behaviours in high-level residential aged care facilities. DESIGN: cluster-randomised controlled trial. SETTING: ten high-level aged care facilities. PARTICIPANTS: 154 residents with medication problems and/or challenging behaviours were selected for case conference by residential care staff. INTERVENTION: two multidisciplinary case conferences involving the resident's general practitioner, a geriatrician, a pharmacist and residential care staff were held at the nursing home for each resident. MEASUREMENTS: outcomes were assessed at baseline and 3 months. The primary outcome was the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). The behaviour of each resident was assessed via the Nursing Home Behaviour Problem Scale. RESULTS: 45 residents died before follow-up. Medication appropriateness improved in the intervention group [MAI mean change 4.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-6.1] compared with the control group (MAI mean change 0.4, 95% CI -0.4-1.2; P < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in the MAI for benzodiazepines (mean change control -0.38, 95% CI -1.02-0.27 versus intervention 0.73, 95% CI 0.16-1.30; P = 0.017). Resident behaviours were unchanged after the intervention and the improved medication appropriateness did not extend to other residents in the facility. CONCLUSION: multidisciplinary case conferences in nursing homes can improve care. Outreach specialist services can be delivered without direct patient contact and achieve improvements in prescribing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., Wieland, G. D., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Adams, J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-v · Cited by 1,974
Snowden, M., Sato, K., & Roy‐Byrne, P. (2003) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51417.x · Cited by 171
Cited by
Cooper, J. A., Cadogan, C. A., Patterson, S. M., Kerse, N., Bradley, M. C., Ryan, C., & Hughes, C. M. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009235 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Crotty, M.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09-22
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 612-617
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2140130572
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An outreach geriatric medication advisory service in residential aged care: a randomised controlled trial of case conferencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/afh213
- The paper
- Crotty, M. (2004). An outreach geriatric medication advisory service in residential aged care: a randomised controlled trial of case conferencing. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afh213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.