The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients: a systematic literature review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the acknowledged clinical importance of delirium, research evidence for measures to improve its management is sparse. A necessary first step to devising appropriate strategies is to understand how common it is and what its outcomes are in any particular setting. OBJECTIVE: To determine the occurrence of delirium and its outcomes in medical in-patients, through a systematic review of the literature. METHOD: We searched electronic medical databases, the Consultation-Liaison Literature Database and reference lists and bibliographies for potentially relevant studies. Studies were selected, quality assessed and data extracted according to preset protocols. RESULTS: Results for the occurrence of delirium in medical in-patients were available for 42 cohorts. Prevalence of delirium at admission ranged from 10 to 31%, incidence of new delirium per admission ranged from 3 to 29% and occurrence rate per admission varied between 11 and 42%. Results for outcomes were available for 19 study cohorts. Delirium was associated with increased mortality at discharge and at 12 months, increased length of hospital stay (LOS) and institutionalisation. A significant proportion of patients had persistent symptoms of delirium at discharge and at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: Delirium is common in medical in-patients and has serious adverse effects on mortality, functional outcomes, LOS and institutionalisation. The development of appropriate strategies to improve its management should be a clinical and research priority. As delirium prevalent at hospital admission is a significant problem, research is also needed into preventative measures that could be applied in community settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reuben, D. B., Inouye, S. K., Bogardus, S. T., Baker, D. I., Leo‐Summers, L., & Cooney, L. M. (2000) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03885.x · Cited by 802
Cited by
Bellelli, G., Morandi, A., Davis, D. H. J., Mazzola, P., Turco, R., Gentile, S., Ryan, T., Cash, H., Guerini, F., Torpilliesi, T., et al. (2014) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afu021 · Cited by 788
Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients
Siddiqi, N., Harrison, J. K., Clegg, A., Teale, E. A., Young, J., Taylor, J., & Simpkins, S. A. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005563.pub3 · Cited by 619
Self-citationAdverse drug reactions in special populations – the elderly
Davies, E. A., & O'Mahony, M. S. (2015) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.12596 · Cited by 604
Systemic infection and delirium: when cytokines and acetylcholine collide
van Gool, W. A., van de Beek, D., & Eikelenboom, P. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61158-2 · Cited by 561
Hospital elder life program: systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness
Hshieh, T. T., Yang, T., Gartaganis, S. L., Yue, J., & Inouye, S. K. (2018) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2018.06.007 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Siddiqi, N., House, A. O., & Holmes, J. D.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-04-28
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 350-364
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2134535009
- Cited by
- 1,186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients: a systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ageing/afl005
- The paper
- Siddiqi, N., House, A. O., & Holmes, J. D. (2006). Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients: a systematic literature review. Age and Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afl005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.