The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength
Abstract
Bone's mechanical competence and its fragility in particular depend to a certain extent on the structure and microstructure of the cortical bone compartment. Beyond bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content, a variety of other features of cortical bone contribute to whole bone's resistance to fracture. Structural properties of cortical bone most commonly employed as surrogate for its mechanical competence include thickness of the cortex, cortical cross-sectional area and area moment of inertia. But microstructural properties such as cortical porosity, crystallinity or the presence of microcracks also contribute to bone's mechanical competence. Microcracks in particular not only weaken the cortical bone tissue but also provide an effective mechanism for energy dissipation. Bone is a damageable, viscoelastic composite and most of all a living material capable of self-repair and thus exhibits a complex repertoire of mechanical properties. This review provides an overview of a variety of features of cortical bone known to provide mechanical competence and how these features may be applied for fracture risk prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cummings, S. R., Karpf, D. B., Harris, F., Genant, H. K., Ensrud, K., LaCroix, A. Z., & Black, D. M. (2002) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(01)01124-x · Cited by 752
Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties
Burstein, A., Reilly, D., & Martens, M. (1976) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-197658010-00015 · Cited by 569
The effects of ageing and changes in mineral content in degrading the toughness of human femora
Currey, J. D., Brear, K., & Zioupos, P. (1996) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)00048-8 · Cited by 318
Cited by
Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age
Ensrud, K. E. (2013) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glt092 · Cited by 456
Heilmeier, U., Cheng, K., Pasco, C., Parrish, R., Nirody, J., Patsch, J. M., Zhang, C. A., Joseph, G. B., Burghardt, A. J., Schwartz, A. V., et al. (2016) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-016-3614-7 · Cited by 60
Schwab, N., Jordana, X., Soler, J., Garrido, X., Brillas, P., Savio, A., Lavín, S., Ortega-Sánchez, M., & Galtés, I. (2023) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-023-08333-6 · Cited by 14
Microscopic Pattern of Bone Fractures as an Indicator of Blast Trauma: A Pilot Study
Pechníková, M., Mazzarelli, D., Poppa, P., Gibelli, D., Scossa Baggi, E., & Cattaneo, C. (2015) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12818 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Augat, P., & Schorlemmer, S.
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- suppl_2
- Pages
- ii27-ii31
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2167751454
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.