Cited by 625Nutrition and Health in AgingFrailty in Older AdultsAging, Health, and Disability

Handgrip strength as a predictor of functional, psychological and social health. A prospective population-based study among the oldest old

Open access
Taekema, D. G., Gussekloo, J., Maier, A. B., Westendorp, R. G. J., de Craen, A. J. M.·2010·Age and Ageing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: muscle wasting is associated with a detrimental outcome in older people. Muscle strength measurements could be useful as part of a clinical evaluation of oldest old patients to determine who are most at risk of accelerated decline in the near future. OBJECTIVE: this study aimed to assess if handgrip strength predicts changes in functional, psychological and social health among oldest old. DESIGN: the Leiden 85-plus Study is a prospective population-based follow-up study. SUBJECTS: five-hundred fifty-five, all aged 85 years at baseline, participated in the study. METHODS: handgrip strength was measured with a handgrip strength dynamometer. Functional, psychological and social health were assessed annually. Baseline data on chronic diseases were obtained from the treating physician, pharmacist, electrocardiogram and blood sample analysis. RESULTS: at age 85, lower handgrip strength was correlated with poorer scores in functional, psychological and social health domains (all, P < 0.001). Lower baseline handgrip strength predicted an accelerated decline in activities of daily living (ADL) and cognition (both, P 0.30). CONCLUSION: poor handgrip strength predicts accelerated dependency in ADL and cognitive decline in oldest old. Measuring handgrip strength could be a useful instrument in geriatric practice to identify those oldest old patients at risk for this accelerated decline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/afq022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EWGSOP2 adopted low muscle strength as a principal determinant of sarcopenia because muscle strength is considered better than muscle mass in predicting adverse outcomes.

    “The group adopted low muscle strength as a principal determinant of sarcopenia because muscle strength is considered better than muscle mass in predicting adverse outcomes (20–22).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 625

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Suzuki T, Sonoda S, Misawa K et al. Incidence and conse- quence of falls in inpatient rehabilitation of stroke patients. Exp Aging Res 2005; 31: 457-69.
  2. Zdobysz JA, Boradia P, Ennis J et al. The relationship between functional independence scores on admission and patient falls after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2005; 12: 65-71.
  3. Teasell R, McRae M, Foley N et al. The incidence and consequences of falls in stroke patients during inpatient rehabilitation: factors associated with high risk. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 329-33.
  4. Lee JE, Stokic DS. Risk factors for falls during inpatient re- habilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 87: 341-50.
  5. Pollak N, Rheault W, Stoecker JL. Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community. Arch Phys Med Reha- bil 1996; 77: 1056-61.
  6. Ottenbacher KJ, Mann WC, Granger CV et al. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the com- munity-based elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1297-301.
  7. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV et al. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1226-32.
  8. Cohen ME, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes re- search functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: S21-9.
  9. von Renteln-Kruse W, Krause T. Fall events in geriatric hos- pital in-patients. Results of prospective recording over a 3 year period. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2004; 37: 9-14.
  10. Schwendimann R, Buhler H, De Geest S et al. Falls and consequent injuries in hospitalized patients: effects of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6: 69.
  11. Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Dubost V et al. Stops walking when talking: a predictor of falls in older adults? Eur J Neurol 2009; 16: 786-95.
  12. Kressig RW, Herrmann FR, Grandjean R et al. Gait variability while dual-tasking: fall predictor in older inpatients? Aging Clin Exp Res 2008; 20: 123-30.
  13. Wyatt J, Altman D. Prognostic models: clinically useful or quickly forgotten? BMJ 1995; 311: 539-41. References

Authors
Taekema, D. G., Gussekloo, J., Maier, A. B., Westendorp, R. G. J., & de Craen, A. J. M.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Taekema, D. G.
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2010-03-10
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
331-337
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2126725714
Cited by
625
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 30
FWCI
16.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ZonMw (05040202, 050-060-810)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (050.060.810, 05040202)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
grip strength, oldest old, muscle atrophy, functional health, activities of daily living, cognitive decline, mental health, social health, dependency, risk prediction, Leiden 85-plus Study
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Geriatric Assessment, Hand Strength, Muscle Strength Dynamometer, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review