Cited by 84Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

The chance of survival and the functional outcome after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older people: a systematic review

van Gijn, M. S., Frijns, D., van de Glind, E. M. M., C. van Munster, B., Hamaker, M. E.·2014·Age and Ageing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: physicians are frequently confronted with the question whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a medically appropriate treatment for older people. For physicians, patients and relatives, it is important to know the chance of survival and the functional outcome after CPR in order to make an informed decision. METHODS: a systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane up to November 2012. Studies that were included described the chance of survival, the social status and functional outcome after in-hospital CPR in older people aged 70 years and above. RESULTS: we identified 11,377 publications of which 29 were included in this review; 38.6% of the patients who were 70 years and older had a return of spontaneous circulation. More than half of the patients who initially survived resuscitation died in the hospital before hospital discharge. The pooled survival to discharge after in-hospital CPR was 18.7% for patients between 70 and 79 years old, 15.4% for patients between 80 and 89 years old and 11.6% for patients of 90 years and older. Data on social and functional outcome after surviving CPR were scarce and contradictory. CONCLUSIONS: the chance of survival to hospital discharge for in-hospital CPR in older people is low to moderate (11.6-18.7%) and decreases with age. However, evidence about functional or social outcomes after surviving CPR is scarce. Prospective studies are needed to address this issue and to identify pre-arrest factors that can predict survival in the older people in order to define subgroups that could benefit from CPR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ageing/afu035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Gijn, M. S., Frijns, D., van de Glind, E. M. M., C. van Munster, B., & Hamaker, M. E.
Affiliations
Diakonessenhuis hospital (NL)
Venue
Age and Ageing
Published
2014-04-22
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
456-463
ISSN
  • 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2834
OpenAlex
W2107702765
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
cardiopulmonary resuscitation, older adults, in-hospital resuscitation, survival to hospital discharge, functional outcome, social outcomes, return of spontaneous circulation, end-of-life decisions
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Survival Rate, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review