Co-morbidities in dementia: time to focus more on assessing and managing co-morbidities
Open accessAbstract
Dementia is commonly associated with co-morbidities. Co-morbidities in dementia may be mistaken for the symptoms of dementia. Co-morbidities in dementia associated with poor outcomes and impaired quality of life. Dementia overshadows recognition of co-morbidities. Interactions between co-morbidities in dementia further worsens outcome. Older people living with dementia have on an average four co-morbidities compared with older people without dementia who have two on average [1]. Nearly 9 in 10 people living with dementia have at-least one other health condition; just under 1 in 6 have one health condition and just over 1 in 6 have 6 health conditions or more [2]. Co-morbidities affecting outcomes in dementia are well known and the impact of such co-morbidities in dementia are well described [3]. Co-morbidities lead to a worse prognosis with increased morbidity and mortality [4, 5]. While it is recognised that co-morbidities affect the course of the illness and its outcome, there are few studies that determine what the co-morbidity profile is in such people suffering with dementia. It is, therefore, assumed that co-morbidities people with dementia present with, are similar to that of age-matched population but this may not necessarily be so. It is also unclear if the co-morbidity profiles differ with the severity of the dementia or if the profiles of co-morbidities are similar between those living in the community compared with those living in supervised settings such as in nursing homes. Ageing in people with dementia also leads to a new effect of multi-morbidity—the interaction of the different co-morbidities. The recognition and effect of this is not that well known. While individual conditions and their impact on the dementing illnesses have been recognised [6] as is also that healthcare expenditure is greater with increased level of co-morbidities [7]; the cumulative impacts of having multiple morbidities and how their interactions affect the progression in dementia are less well recognised. In a timely and pertinent accompanying article (the IDEAL study) in this issue, Nelis and colleagues [8] aim to identify the co-morbidity profile of community dwelling older people with dementia and examine the associations between severity of co-morbidity, quality of life- and health-related quality of life and the common combinations of co-morbid conditions. They demonstrate that those with the greatest levels of co-morbidity also show the greatest impact on well-being. In clinical practice, dementia is often the main theme in consultations and co-morbidities are paid less attention [9]. People with dementias face a real risk of serious delay in recognising new symptoms or exacerbation of old symptoms. Nearly 1 in 2 of nursing home residents with dementia with acute infections receives no physical assessment [10]. Unplanned emergency medical admissions occur in about 1 in 5 of people with dementia with a higher risk of mortality at 6 months [11, 12]. Co-morbidity and poor control of existing conditions result in increased care giver burden [13, 14, 15] and increase health and social care costs [16]. People with dementia and co-morbidities are likely to be hospitalised more often and spend longer in hospitals [17, 18, 19], but more importantly many of these admissions are preventable [20]. Management of such people is also complicated with polypharmacy and over and under treatment of conditions [21]. As a result their physical and psychological well-being may be compromised with impaired quality of life and ensuing disability [22]. Timely identification of physical symptoms lead to decreased hospitalisation [13] reduced healthcare costs [23] and maintaining physical comfort and quality of life [24, 25]. It is time that we put a greater emphasis and start focussing more on attempts to assess and manage the nature and impact of different co-morbidities in people with dementia and be vigilant to the interacting effects between the co-morbidities. Care service provision and organisation of care should have the ability to deal with multiple conditions in an integrated way targeting the interventions to deal with co-morbidities at the groups most at risk. Declarations of Conflicts of Interest: None. Declarations of Sources of Funding: None.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current guidelines and literature inadequately address the complexity of managing MLTCiD, with a tendency for a single-disease focus; only one of 13 NICE guidance documents acknowledged the impact of dementia on care management.
“Current guidelines and literature inadequately addresses the complexity of managing MLTCiD with a tendency for a single-disease focus (i.e., only one of 13 NICE guidance documents acknowledged the impact of dementia on care management [20]) [21–24].”
From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
The Abstract says that few studies examine co-morbidity profiles in people with dementia, that interactions among conditions are poorly understood, and that care should address multiple conditions in an integrated way. This supports the claim of inadequate attention to the complexity of managing multiple conditions, but the paper does not establish that guidelines have a single-disease focus. The NICE figure is attached to a separate citation [20], not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 28
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Intrator O, Mor V, Zinn J. Nursing homes characteristics and potentially preventable hospitalisation of long-stay resi- dents. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52: 1730-6.
- Carter MW, Porell FW. Variations in hospitalisation rates among nursing home residents: the role of facility and market attributes. Gerontology 2003; 43: 175-91.
- Barry CR, Brown K, Esker D, Denning MD, Kruse RL, Binder EF. Nursing assessment of III nursing home resi- dents. J Gerontol Nurs 2002; 28: 4-7.
- Authors
- Subramaniam, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Subramaniam, Hari
- ORCID
- Subramaniam, Hari
- Venue
- Age and Ageing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-03-28
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 314-315
- ISSN
- 0002-0729 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2834
- OpenAlex
- W2932087313
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Age and Ageing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L001853/2)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- dementia, multimorbidity, comorbidities, comorbidity profiles, comorbidity severity, health-related quality of life, dementia severity, community-dwelling older adults, nursing homes, comorbidity interaction, health care expenditure, IDEAL study, geriatrics, geriatric nursing, geriatric rehabilitation, geriatric psychiatry, geriatric palliative care
- MeSH terms
- Dementia, Humans, Quality of Life, Comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review