Cited by 69Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Evaluation of modified multicompartment models to calculate body composition in healthy males

Open access
Forslund, AH, Johansson, AG, Sjödin, A, Bryding, G, Ljunghall, S, Hambraeus, L·1996·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop flexible and accurate multicompartment equations to calculate body composition and compare the results with methods using common two-compartment equations. Twenty-two healthy male volunteers 22-59 y of age were studied. Body volume was measured by underwater weighing (UWW) or with a skinfold caliper, bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and body water by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The percentage of water and bone mineral in fat-free mass (FFM) had a significant effect on the difference in percentage fat obtained by the two-compartment model compared with a four-compartment model. FFM density was negatively (r = -0.76, P < 0.001) and percentage water in FFM was positively correlated with age (r = 0.75, P < 0.001). The three-compartment model based on field-adapted methods (skinfold thickness + BIA) to calculate percentage body fat correlated significantly with the more complex four-compartment model (UWW + BIA + DXA; r = 0.95, P < 0.001). The advantages of three- and four-compartment equations are that they compensate for differences in body content of bone mineral and water.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/63.6.856

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multi-compartment models have the ability to distinguish multiple tissue components, which reduces the assumptions from which body composition estimates are based and increases the accuracy.

    “Multi-compartment models have the ability to distinguish multiple tissue components, which reduces the assumptions from which body composition estimates are based and increases the accuracy [70,71].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forslund, A., Johansson, A., Sjödin, A., Bryding, G., Ljunghall, S., & Hambraeus, L.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-06
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
856-862
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117766380
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
body composition, multi-compartment model, three-compartment model, four-compartment model, two-compartment model, body water content, bone mineral content, body fat percentage, skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis, underwater weighing, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, healthy men
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Body Water, Body Weight, Humans, Immersion, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Skinfold Thickness, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Body Mass Index, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review