Cited by 61Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBody Composition Measurement TechniquesPregnancy-related medical research

Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis in women with a normal and hypertensive pregnancy

Open access
Valensise, Herbert, Andreoli, Angela, Lello, Stefano, Magnani, Francesca, Romanini, Carlo, De Lorenzo, Antonino·2000·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background An increase in total body water is common in normal pregnancy. It is thought to be an important mechanism of maternal adaptation to pregnancy. Objective The aim of the present study was to assess longitudinal changes in body water compartments in pregnant women and to correlate these measurements with the course of pregnancy. Design One hundred seventy-three pregnant women with apparently normal, single pregnancies participated in this longitudinal study. Anthropometric measurements and multifrequency bioelectrical impedance were performed during the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy. Results One hundred three of the women completed all of the measurements; 50 of the women had a normal pregnancy and 13 had gestational hypertension. Total body water, extracellular water, and intracellular water values in normal pregnancies showed a significant, progressive increase throughout pregnancy. In women with gestational hypertension, total body water, extracellular water, and intracellular water values showed an opposite trend, suggesting a lack of plasma volume expansion through fluid-retention mechanisms. Conclusions Our results show that multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis can be used to monitor variations in body water compartments in normal pregnancy and detect gestational hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/72.3.780

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valensise, H., Andreoli, A., Lello, S., Magnani, F., Romanini, C., & De Lorenzo, A.
Affiliations
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
780-783
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1902865613
Cited by
61
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, total body water, extracellular water, intracellular water, gestational hypertension, pregnancy, plasma expansion, fluid retention, body water compartments
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Water, Extracellular Space, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Intracellular Fluid, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Reference Values, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review