Cited by 332Folate and B Vitamins ResearchNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

Will mandatory folic acid fortification prevent or promote cancer?

Open access
Kim, Young-In·2004·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

An overwhelming body of evidence for a protective effect of periconceptional folic acid supplementation against neural tube defects (NTDs) led to mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States. The effectiveness of folic acid fortification in improving folate status has already been shown to be quite striking, with a dramatic increase in blood measurements of folate in the United States. Preliminary reports also suggest a significant reduction ( approximately 15-50%) in NTDs in the United States. The success of folic acid fortification in improving folate status and in reducing NTD rates is truly a public health triumph and provides a paradigm of collaboration between science and public health policy. Although folic acid is generally regarded as safe, there continues to be concern that folic acid fortification may have adverse effects in subpopulation groups not originally targeted for fortification. In this regard, an emerging body of evidence suggests that folic acid supplementation may enhance the development and progression of already existing, undiagnosed premalignant and malignant lesions. Over the past few years, the US population has been exposed to a significant increase in folate intake, for which essentially no data on safety exist. The potential cancer-promoting effect of folic acid supplementation needs to be considered in carefully monitoring the long-term effect of folic acid fortification on the vast majority of the US population, who are not at risk of NTDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/80.5.1123

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal studies suggest folate might increase cancer progression if given to nascent colon tumors.

    “In this regard, animal studies suggest that folate might actually increase cancer progression if given to nascent tumors in the colon (Kim, 2004).”

    From Influence of Metabolism on Epigenetics and Disease (2013) · cites this paper as Kim, 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 332

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Institute of Medicine. Folate. In: Dietary reference intakes for thiamin, roboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, pantothenic acid, biotin, and choline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998: 196 -305.
  2. Food and Drug Administration. Food standards: amendment of stan- dards of identity for enriched grain products to require addition of folic acid. Final rule. 21 CFR Parts 136, 137, and 139. Fed Regist 1996;61: 8781-807.
  3. Health Canada. Regulations amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1066). Can Gaz Part 1 1997;131:3702-37.
  4. Bower C, Ryan A, Rudy E, Miller M. Trends in neural tube defects in Western Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2002;26:150 -1.
  5. Preston-Martin S, Pogoda JM, Mueller BA, et al. Prenatal vitamin sup- plementation and risk of childhood brain tumors. Int J Cancer Suppl 1998;11:17-22.

Authors
Kim, Y.-I.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Kim, Young-In
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
1123-1128
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1908008529
Cited by
332
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 28
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
folic acid fortification, mandatory fortification, cancer risk, folate status, neural tube defects, periconceptional supplementation, folate intake, precancerous lesions, tumor progression, public health policy
MeSH terms
Animals, Folic Acid, Food, Fortified, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Neoplasms, Neural Tube Defects, DNA Methylation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review