Cited by 83Coffee research and impactsNutritional Studies and DietAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Caffeinated beverage intake and the risk of heart disease mortality in the elderly: a prospective analysis

Open access
Greenberg, James A, Dunbar, Christopher C, Schnoll, Roseanne, Kokolis, Rodamanthos, Kokolis, Spyro, Kassotis, John·2007·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Motivated by the possibility that caffeine could ameliorate the effect of postprandial hypotension on a high risk of coronary events and mortality in aging, we hypothesized that caffeinated beverage consumption decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in the elderly.Objective The objective of the study was to use prospective cohort study data to test whether the consumption of caffeinated beverages exhibits this protective effect.Design Cox regression analyses were conducted for 426 CVD deaths that occurred during an 8.8-y follow-up in the prospective first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. The analysis involved 6594 participants aged 32-86 y with no history of CVD at baseline.Results Participants aged >or=65 y with higher caffeinated beverage intake exhibited lower relative risk of CVD and heart disease mortality than did participants with lower caffeinated beverage intake. It was a dose-response protective effect: the relative risk (95% CI) for heart disease mortality was 1.00 (referent), 0.77 (0.54, 1.10), 0.68 (0.49, 0.94), and 0.47 (0.32, 0.69) for <0.5, 0.5-2, 2-4, and >or=4 servings/d, respectively (P for trend = 0.003). A similar protective effect was found for caffeine intake in mg/d. The protective effective was found only in participants who were not severely hypertensive. No significant protective effect was found in participants aged <65 y or in cerebrovascular disease mortality for those aged >or=65 y.Conclusion Habitual intake of caffeinated beverages provided protection against the risk of heart disease mortality among elderly participants in this prospective epidemiologic analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/85.2.392

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 83

Authors
Greenberg, J. A., Dunbar, C. C., Schnoll, R., Kokolis, R., Kokolis, S., & Kassotis, J.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Greenberg, James A
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
392-398
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167294622
Cited by
83
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
caffeinated beverages, caffeine consumption, heart disease mortality, cardiovascular mortality, older adults, postprandial hypotension, hypertension, dose-response relationship, cerebrovascular disease mortality, NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Beverages, Blood Pressure, Caffeine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review