A novel interaction between dietary composition and insulin secretion: effects on weight gain in the Quebec Family Study
Open accessAbstract
Background Clinical trials of low-fat diets characteristically produce small mean long-term weight loss but a large interindividual variation in response. This variation has been attributed to psychological and behavioral factors, although biological differences may also play a role.Objective The objective was to determine whether physiologic differences in insulin secretion explain differences in weight gain among individuals consuming low- and high-fat diets.Design Of 276 individuals followed in the Quebec Family Study for a mean of 6 y, we compared those in the lowest with those in the highest dietary fat tertiles. We performed oral-glucose-tolerance tests at baseline and examined the insulin concentration at 30 min (insulin-30) as a proxy measure of insulin secretion. Six-year changes in body weight and waist circumference were the primary endpoints. We determined the associations between insulin-30 and the primary endpoints by linear regression analysis, with adjustment for potentially confounding factors.Results Mean changes in body weight and waist circumference did not differ significantly between the lowest- and highest-fat diet groups. However, these endpoints were strongly associated with insulin-30, especially among individuals consuming the lowest-fat diet. Insulin-30 at baseline was significantly associated with 6-y weight gain (r = 0.51, P < 0.0001) and change in waist circumference (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) in the lowest diet fat, group [corrected], but not in the highest diet fat group (r = 0.18, P = 0.086 and r = 0.20, P = 0.058, respectively) [corrected] Individuals in the highest insulin-30 and lowest dietary fat group gained 1.8 kg more than did those in the highest insulin-30 and highest dietary fat group (51%; P = 0.034); they gained 4.5 kg more than did those in the lowest insulin-30 and lowest dietary fat group (6.5-fold; P = 0.0026).Conclusion A proxy measure of insulin secretion strongly predicts changes in body weight and waist circumference over 6 y in adults, especially among those consuming lower-fat diets, which demonstrates the existence of a novel diet-phenotype interaction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with high insulin secretion or other abnormalities of glucose homeostasis appear especially susceptible to adverse metabolic responses and weight gain when consuming a high-GL diet.
“Furthermore, studies suggest a unique diet–phenotype interaction, in that individuals with high insulin secretion or other abnormalities of glucose homeostasis appear especially susceptible to adverse metabolic responses and weight gain when consuming a high-GL diet (96, 105–110).”
From The carbohydrate-insulin model: A physiological perspective on the obesity pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [105]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 73
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Katan MB, Grundy SM, Willett WC. Should a low-fat, high- carbohydrate diet be recommended for everyone? Beyond low-fat diets. N Engl J Med 1997;337:563-6.
- Bouchard C. Genetic and body fat content. Prog Obes Res 1996;5:33- 41.
- The Airlie (VA) Consensus Conference. Standardization of anthropo- metric measurements. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1988.
- Authors
- Chaput, J.-P., Tremblay, A., Rimm, E. B., Bouchard, C., & Ludwig, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ludwig, David S
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 303-309
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159561537
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2008-05-01)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Charles H. Hood Foundation
- Université Laval
- Medical Research Council Canada
- National Institutes of Health (5r01dk059240-04)
- Medical Research Council
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1R01 DK59240, R01DK073025, R01DK072428, P30DK040561)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Keywords
- insulin secretion, dietary fat, low-fat diet, weight gain, waist circumference, interindividual variability, obesity, oral glucose tolerance test, Quebec Family Study
- MeSH terms
- Insulin Secretion, Adult, Aged, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Predictive Value of Tests, Quebec, Weight Gain, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Glycemic Index, Waist-Hip Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review