Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Toward Objective Quality Assurance in Cervical Cytopathology:Correlation of Cytopathologic Diagnoses with Detection of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Types

Sherman, Mark E., Schiffman, Mark H., Lorincz, Attila T., Michele Manos, M., Scott, David R., Kurman, Robert J., Kiviat, Nancy B., Stoler, Mark, Glass, Andrew G., Rush, Brenda B.·1994·American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract

Using The Bethesda System, five pathologists independently diagnosed 200 smears that originally had been classified as "atypical," and the results were correlated with concurrent detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA by Southern analysis and by polymerase chain reaction amplification. The smears were reclassified as benign reactive changes (negative), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, or squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL). Exact five-way cytologic agreement was achieved in only 29% of smears, and no slide was diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance by all reviewers. The detection of high-risk types of HPV correlated strongly with the likelihood of a diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesion. High-risk HPV types were detected in approximately 60% of smears reclassified as squamous intraepithelial lesion compared with 30% of those reclassified as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and 10% of negative smears (P < .001). Every smear unanimously diagnosed by the panel as squamous intraepithelial lesion was associated with detectable HPV DNA, mainly of high-risk types. Low-risk HPV DNA types were found with similar frequency in all diagnostic categories assigned by the reviewers. Based on the consistent relation between high-risk HPV detection and diagnoses according to the Bethesda System, the authors conclude that HPV testing may have an important role in quality assurance in cervical cytopathology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcp/102.2.182

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Sherman, M. E., Schiffman, M. H., Lorincz, A. T., Michele Manos, M., Scott, D. R., Kurman, R. J., Kiviat, N. B., Stoler, M., Glass, A. G., & Rush, B. B.
Venue
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Published
1994-08-01
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
182-187
ISSN
  • 0002-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7722
OpenAlex
W108835801
Cited by
204
References
0
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Objective Quality Assurance in Cervical Cytopathology:Correlation of Cytopathologic Diagnoses with Detection of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ajcp/102.2.182
The paper
Sherman, M. E., Schiffman, M. H., Lorincz, A. T., Michele Manos, M., Scott, D. R., Kurman, R. J., Kiviat, N. B., Stoler, M., Glass, A. G., & Rush, B. B. (1994). Toward Objective Quality Assurance in Cervical Cytopathology:Correlation of Cytopathologic Diagnoses with Detection of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Types. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/102.2.182

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.