The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward Objective Quality Assurance in Cervical Cytopathology:Correlation of Cytopathologic Diagnoses with Detection of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Types
Abstract
Using The Bethesda System, five pathologists independently diagnosed 200 smears that originally had been classified as "atypical," and the results were correlated with concurrent detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA by Southern analysis and by polymerase chain reaction amplification. The smears were reclassified as benign reactive changes (negative), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, or squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL). Exact five-way cytologic agreement was achieved in only 29% of smears, and no slide was diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance by all reviewers. The detection of high-risk types of HPV correlated strongly with the likelihood of a diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesion. High-risk HPV types were detected in approximately 60% of smears reclassified as squamous intraepithelial lesion compared with 30% of those reclassified as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and 10% of negative smears (P < .001). Every smear unanimously diagnosed by the panel as squamous intraepithelial lesion was associated with detectable HPV DNA, mainly of high-risk types. Low-risk HPV DNA types were found with similar frequency in all diagnostic categories assigned by the reviewers. Based on the consistent relation between high-risk HPV detection and diagnoses according to the Bethesda System, the authors conclude that HPV testing may have an important role in quality assurance in cervical cytopathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer
Burd, E. M. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.1.1-17.2003 · Cited by 2,420
Stoler, M. H. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.11.1500 · Cited by 1,087
Self-citationArbyn, M., Buntinx, F., Ranst, M. V., Paraskevaidis, E., Martin-Hirsch, P., & Dillner, J. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh037 · Cited by 359
Tsoumpou, I., Arbyn, M., Kyrgiou, M., Wentzensen, N., Koliopoulos, G., Martin-Hirsch, P., Malamou-Mitsi, V., & Paraskevaidis, E. (2009) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.10.005 · Cited by 323
2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Cytological Abnormalities
Wright, T. C., Cox, J. T., Massad, L. S., Twiggs, L. B., & Wilkinson, E. J. (2002) · Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease · doi:10.1097/00128360-200204000-00012 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Sherman, M. E., Schiffman, M. H., Lorincz, A. T., Michele Manos, M., Scott, D. R., Kurman, R. J., Kiviat, N. B., Stoler, M., Glass, A. G., & Rush, B. B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-08-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182-187
- ISSN
- 0002-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7722
- OpenAlex
- W108835801
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Objective Quality Assurance in Cervical Cytopathology:Correlation of Cytopathologic Diagnoses with Detection of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ajcp/102.2.182
- The paper
- Sherman, M. E., Schiffman, M. H., Lorincz, A. T., Michele Manos, M., Scott, D. R., Kurman, R. J., Kiviat, N. B., Stoler, M., Glass, A. G., & Rush, B. B. (1994). Toward Objective Quality Assurance in Cervical Cytopathology:Correlation of Cytopathologic Diagnoses with Detection of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Types. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/102.2.182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.