Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,668

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cytochemical Identification of Monocytes and Granulocytes

Yam, L. T., Li, C. Y., Crosby, W. H.·1971·American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract

Cytochemical methods for chloroacetate esterase, nonspecific esterase, peroxidase, and metachromasia were used to identify monocytes and neutrophilic, basophilic, or eosinophilic granulocytes. These methods are very simple, sensitive, and easily reproducible. Their reaction products are highly chromogenic and insoluble in most organic solvents. Any of these methods may be used independently or in combination with another cytochemical method to demonstrate a particular type of cell as desired. The specific aims and possible areas for clinical application of these cytochemical methods are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcp/55.3.283

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,668

Metadata

Authors
Yam, L. T., Li, C. Y., & Crosby, W. H.
Venue
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Published
1971-03-01
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
283-290
ISSN
  • 0002-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7722
OpenAlex
W2329211716
Cited by
2,668
References
0
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytochemical Identification of Monocytes and Granulocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ajcp/55.3.283
The paper
Yam, L. T., Li, C. Y., & Crosby, W. H. (1971). Cytochemical Identification of Monocytes and Granulocytes. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/55.3.283

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.