The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Specimen Pooling to Conserve SARS CoV-2 Testing Resources
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To establish the optimal parameters for group testing of pooled specimens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: The most efficient pool size was determined to be five specimens using a web-based application. From this analysis, 25 experimental pools were created using 50 µL from one SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal specimen mixed with 4 negative patient specimens (50 µL each) for a total volume of 250 µL. Viral RNA was subsequently extracted from each pool and tested using the CDC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay. Positive pools were consequently split into individual specimens and tested by extraction and PCR. This method was also tested on an unselected group of 60 nasopharyngeal specimens grouped into 12 pools. Results: All 25 pools were positive with cycle threshold (Ct) values within 0 and 5.03 Ct of the original individual specimens. The analysis of 60 specimens determined that 2 pools were positive followed by identification of 2 individual specimens among the 60 tested. This testing was accomplished while using 22 extractions/PCR tests, a savings of 38 reactions. Conclusions: When the incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection is 10% or less, group testing will result in the saving of reagents and personnel time with an overall increase in testing capability of at least 69%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
COVID-19—New Insights on a Rapidly Changing Epidemic
del Rio, C., & Malani, P. N. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3072 · Cited by 756
Diagnostic Testing for the Novel Coronavirus
Sharfstein, J. M., Becker, S. J., & Mello, M. M. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3864 · Cited by 230
Hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV transfusion‐transmitted infections in the 21st century
Dwyre, D. M., Fernando, L. P., & Holland, P. V. (2010) · Vox Sanguinis · doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01426.x · Cited by 147
Cited by
Kost, G. J. (2021) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/arpa.2020-0443-sa · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdalhamid, B., Bilder, C. R., McCutchen, E. L., Hinrichs, S. H., Koepsell, S. A., & Iwen, P. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-04-18
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 715-718
- ISSN
- 0002-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7722
- OpenAlex
- W3016677553
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Specimen Pooling to Conserve SARS CoV-2 Testing Resources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa064
- The paper
- Abdalhamid, B., Bilder, C. R., McCutchen, E. L., Hinrichs, S. H., Koepsell, S. A., & Iwen, P. C. (2020). Assessment of Specimen Pooling to Conserve SARS CoV-2 Testing Resources. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.