Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED MENOPAUSAL STATUS IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

COLDITZ, G. A., STAMPFER, M. J., WILLETT, W. C., STASON, W. B., ROSNER, B., HENNEKENS, C. H., SPEIZER, F. E.·1987·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status were evaluated among the 121,700 female US registered nurses aged 30-55 years in 1976 who are participants in the Nurses' Health Study, a prospective cohort study of diseases in women. When questioned in 1978, 6,591 of the women who were premenopausal in 1976 reported that their menses had ceased and provided their age at menopause. Two years later, in 1980, 98.8 per cent of the 6,591 women again reported that they were postmenopausal and again gave the reasons for menopause (natural or surgical). Among those women who reported surgical menopause during the 1976-1978 follow-up interval, age at menopause was reported to within one year on both the 1978 and 1980 questionnaires by 95 per cent of women. Among those reporting natural menopause during the 1976-1978 period, 82 per cent of women reported their age at menopause to within one year on the two follow-up questionnaires. A random sample of 255 women reporting surgical menopause between 1982 and 1984 was identified and medical records were obtained for 200. For all but two women, there was complete agreement between self-report and medical record for details of hysterectomy and extent of ovarian surgery. The reproducibility of self-reported age at menopause was assessed among 31,405 women who were menopausal in 1976. Reported age at menopause on consecutive questionnaires showed increasing within-person variance with increasing duration since menopause.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/126.2.319

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
COLDITZ, G. A., STAMPFER, M. J., WILLETT, W. C., STASON, W. B., ROSNER, B., HENNEKENS, C. H., & SPEIZER, F. E.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1987-08-01
Volume
126
Issue
2
Pages
319-325
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2099028725
Cited by
453
References
0
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED MENOPAUSAL STATUS IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/126.2.319
The paper
COLDITZ, G. A., STAMPFER, M. J., WILLETT, W. C., STASON, W. B., ROSNER, B., HENNEKENS, C. H., & SPEIZER, F. E. (1987). REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED MENOPAUSAL STATUS IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/126.2.319

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.