The DOI matches its Crossref record.
REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED MENOPAUSAL STATUS IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
Abstract
The reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status were evaluated among the 121,700 female US registered nurses aged 30-55 years in 1976 who are participants in the Nurses' Health Study, a prospective cohort study of diseases in women. When questioned in 1978, 6,591 of the women who were premenopausal in 1976 reported that their menses had ceased and provided their age at menopause. Two years later, in 1980, 98.8 per cent of the 6,591 women again reported that they were postmenopausal and again gave the reasons for menopause (natural or surgical). Among those women who reported surgical menopause during the 1976-1978 follow-up interval, age at menopause was reported to within one year on both the 1978 and 1980 questionnaires by 95 per cent of women. Among those reporting natural menopause during the 1976-1978 period, 82 per cent of women reported their age at menopause to within one year on the two follow-up questionnaires. A random sample of 255 women reporting surgical menopause between 1982 and 1984 was identified and medical records were obtained for 200. For all but two women, there was complete agreement between self-report and medical record for details of hysterectomy and extent of ovarian surgery. The reproducibility of self-reported age at menopause was assessed among 31,405 women who were menopausal in 1976. Reported age at menopause on consecutive questionnaires showed increasing within-person variance with increasing duration since menopause.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grodstein, F., Manson, J. E., Colditz, G. A., Willett, W. C., Speizer, F. E., & Stampfer, M. J. (2000) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-12-200012190-00008 · Cited by 1,063
Self-citationAdult Weight Change and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer
Eliassen, A. H., Colditz, G. A., Rosner, B., Willett, W. C., & Hankinson, S. E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.2.193 · Cited by 654
Self-citationParker, W. H., Broder, M. S., Chang, E., Feskanich, D., Farquhar, C., Liu, Z., Shoupe, D., Berek, J. S., Hankinson, S., & Manson, J. E. (2009) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181a11c64 · Cited by 640
Age at menopause as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality
van der Schouw, Y. T., van der Graaf, Y., Steyerberg, E. W., Eijkemans, M. J. C., & Banga, J. D. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90075-6 · Cited by 616
A Prospective Study of Body Mass Index, Weight Change, and Risk of Stroke in Women
Rexrode, K. M. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540430051032 · Cited by 617
Metadata
- Authors
- COLDITZ, G. A., STAMPFER, M. J., WILLETT, W. C., STASON, W. B., ROSNER, B., HENNEKENS, C. H., & SPEIZER, F. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-08-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 319-325
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2099028725
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED MENOPAUSAL STATUS IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/126.2.319
- The paper
- COLDITZ, G. A., STAMPFER, M. J., WILLETT, W. C., STASON, W. B., ROSNER, B., HENNEKENS, C. H., & SPEIZER, F. E. (1987). REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED MENOPAUSAL STATUS IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/126.2.319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.