Cited by 2Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningWomen's cancer prevention and management

Invited Commentary: Rethinking Cervical Cancer Elimination in Terms of Lifetime Risk Rather Than Arbitrarily Defined Age-Standardized Incidence Rates

Malagón, Talía, Franco, Eduardo L·2021·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

In their accompanying article, Vänskä et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(4):506-514) provide us with cohort lifetime risks of cervical cancer attributable to different types of human papillomavirus in Sweden. We argue that a standardized lifetime risk such as those calculated by Vänskä et al. might be a more appropriate public health target for cervical cancer elimination than age-standardized incidence rates. Age standardization to an arbitrary standard age distribution implies an implicit value choice regarding the weight of different age groups for which we find little moral justification. Conversely, a standardized lifetime risk uses standard life expectancy as a weight, corresponding to the likelihood that cervical cancer would impact a woman and prevent her from pursuing opportunities within a standard life span. Based on the data from Vänskä et al., a standardized lifetime risk of 129-250 cervical cancers per 100,000 women born could be an aspirational alternative public health target for cervical cancer elimination as a public health problem, complementary to the World Health Organization's arbitrary draft target of 4 cervical cancers per 100,000 age-standardized woman-years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwaa120

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SLTR threshold is based on the level of cervical cancer risk projected in a setting with elimination of all HPV16/18 cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening in place.

    “the SLTR threshold is based on the level of risk of cervical cancer projected in a setting with elimination of all cervical cancer due to HPV16 and HPV18 and cervical cancer screening in place.25”
  • Using SLTR to define public health targets allows comparison against the highest observed life expectancy standards and provides an alternative standardisation not relying on outdated world population age distribution.

    “using SLTR to define public health targets allows comparison of actual or projected outcomes against the highest observed life expectancy standards, and provides an alternative approach to standardisation that does not rely on outdated world population age distribution.25”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malagón, T., & Franco, E. L.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Malagón, Talía
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2020-07-08
Volume
190
Issue
4
Pages
515-518
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W3041469374
Cited by
2
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
cervical cancer elimination, lifetime risk, age-standardized incidence rate, human papillomavirus, public health targets, Sweden
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Sweden, Incidence, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Alphapapillomavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review