Cited by 212Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesRace, Genetics, and Society

What Structural Racism Is (or Is Not) and How to Measure It: Clarity for Public Health and Medical Researchers

Open access
Dean, Lorraine T, Thorpe, Roland J·2022·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Interest in studying structural racism’s impacts on health has grown exponentially in recent years. Across these studies, there is much heterogeneity in the definition and measurement of structural racism, leading to mixed interpretations of structural racism’s impact on health. A precise definition of structural racism can offer conceptual clarity to inform what mechanisms to investigate and is imperative for conducting high-quality research on it and dismantling it. In this commentary, we trace the evolution of the definitions of structural racism and suggest ways in which the measurement of structural racism should move forward given these definitions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwac112

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The published empirical literature provides a narrow view of structural racism's impacts on HIV health outcomes, partly due to the finite ways of practically measuring racism at a structural level.

    “First, as our review demonstrates, the published empirical literature provides a narrow view of structural racism’s impacts on the health outcomes for HIV, partly due to the finite ways of practically measuring racism at a structural level [36,37].”

    From Structural Racism Conceptualization and Operationalization for Research for the U.S. HIV Epidemic: Findings from a Scoping Review and Implications for Advancing Research for Structural Interventions (2024) · cites this paper as [36]

    The STRUCTURAL RACISM MEASURES section (page unavailable) says existing measures can miss the interacting effects of societal structures, and Table 1 identifies further measurement limitations. This supports the claim that measurement practices constrain what researchers can assess, but the paper does not establish that the empirical literature provides a narrow view specifically of HIV health outcomes; the citing authors attribute that finding to their own review. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies used experiences of racial discrimination as proxies for structural racism within HIV research.

    “Several studies utilized experiences of racial discrimination as “proxies” for structural racism within HIV research [36].”

    From Structural Racism Conceptualization and Operationalization for Research for the U.S. HIV Epidemic: Findings from a Scoping Review and Implications for Advancing Research for Structural Interventions (2024) · cites this paper as [36]

    The 'WHAT STRUCTURAL RACISM IS NOT' section distinguishes interpersonal racism from structural racism, and 'STRUCTURAL RACISM MEASURES' discusses other measures used in health research. Neither section reports that HIV studies used experiences of racial discrimination as proxies for structural racism. Searches for HIV and for discrimination used as a proxy found no passage addressing that claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Gee GC, Ford CL. Structural racism and health inequities: old issues, new directions. Du Bois Rev. 2011; 8(1): 115– 132. 25632292 PMC4306458
  2. [2]Kiang MV, Tsai AC. Failure of leadership in US academic medicine after George Floyd’s killing by police and amidst subsequent unrest. Ann Epidemiol. 2021; 65: 116– 119. 34023486 PMC8606007
  3. [4]Blachman-Demner DR, Tyus NC. Efforts to advance NIH-funded behavioral and social sciences research on structural racism and health [published online ahead of print May 22, 2022]. Transl Behav Med. (10.1093/tbm/ibac036). PMC9384091 35640244 · DOI
  4. [6]Lett E, Adekunle D, McMurray P, et al. Health equity tourism: ravaging the justice landscape. J Med Syst. 2022; 46(3): 17. 35150324 PMC8853313
  5. [7]Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA. Racism and health: evidence and needed research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019; 40: 105– 125. 30601726 PMC6532402
  6. [8]Krieger N. Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. In: Embodying Inequality: Epidemiologic Perspectives. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishers; 2005: 159– 162. 10379455
  7. [9]Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997; 18(1): 341– 378. 9143723
  8. [10]Jones CP. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener’s tale. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90(8): 1212– 1215. 10936998 PMC1446334
  9. [11]Dovidio J, Gaertner S. Aversive racism. In: Zanna M, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 36. New York, NY: Elsevier B.V.; 2004: 1– 52.
  10. [12]Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL. The aversive form of racism. In: Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, eds. Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.; 1986: 61– 89.
  11. [13]Bailey ZD, Feldman JM, Bassett MT. How structural racism works—racist policies as a root cause of US racial health inequities. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(8): 768– 773. 33326717 PMC11393777
  12. [14]Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, et al. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet. 2017; 389(10077): 1453– 1463. 28402827
  13. [15]Adkins-Jackson PB, Chantarat T, Bailey ZD, et al. Measuring structural racism: a guide for epidemiologists and other health researchers. Am J Epidemiol. 2022; 191(4): 539– 547. 34564723 PMC9077112
  14. [16]Holmes SM. An ethnographic study of the social context of migrant health in the United States. PLoS Med. 2006; 3(10): e448. 17076567 PMC1621098
  15. [17]Groos M, Wallace M, Hardeman R, et al. Measuring inequity: a systematic review of methods used to quantify structural racism. J Health Disparities Res Pract. 2018; 11(2): 13.
  16. [18]Wallace ME, Mendola P, Liu D, et al. Joint effects of structural racism and income inequality on small-for-gestational-age birth. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105(8): 1681– 1688. 26066964 PMC4504298
  17. [20]Lukachko A, Hatzenbuehler ML, Keyes KM. Structural racism and myocardial infarction in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 103: 42– 50. 24507909 PMC4133127
  18. [21]Jahn JL. Invited commentary: comparing approaches to measuring structural racism. Am J Epidemiol. 2021; 191(4): 548– 551. PMC9630390 34718384
  19. [22]Chantarat T, Van Riper DC, Hardeman RR. The intricacy of structural racism measurement: a pilot development of a latent-class multidimensional measure. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 40: 101092. 34746713 PMC8548924
  20. [24]Szanton SL, LaFave SE, Thorpe RJ. Structural racial discrimination and structural resilience: measurement precedes change. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022; 77(2): 402– 404. 34940845 PMC8824604
  21. [25]Thorpe RJ Jr, Norris KC, Beech BM, et al. Racism across the life course. In: Ford CL, Griffith DM, Bruce MA, et al., eds. Racism: Science & Tools for the Public Health Professional. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2019: 209– 222.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dean, L. T., & Thorpe, R. J.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Dean, Lorraine T
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2022-07-05
Volume
191
Issue
9
Pages
1521-1526
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W4284668277
Cited by
212
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 9
FWCI
65.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • National Institute on Aging (K02AG059140, DP1AG069874, P30AG059298)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL164116)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R25MH083620)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD000214)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
structural racism, health disparities, conceptual clarity, racism and health, public health research
MeSH terms
Systemic Racism, Health Personnel, Humans, Public Health, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review