Cited by 728Air Quality and Health ImpactsStatistical Methods in EpidemiologySpatial and Panel Data Analysis

On the use of generalized additive models in time-series studies of air pollution and health

Dominici, F.·2002·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The widely used generalized additive models (GAM) method is a flexible and effective technique for conducting nonlinear regression analysis in time-series studies of the health effects of air pollution. When the data to which the GAM are being applied have two characteristics--1) the estimated regression coefficients are small and 2) there exist confounding factors that are modeled using at least two nonparametric smooth functions--the default settings in the gam function of the S-Plus software package (version 3.4) do not assure convergence of its iterative estimation procedure and can provide biased estimates of regression coefficients and standard errors. This phenomenon has occurred in time-series analyses of contemporary data on air pollution and mortality. To evaluate the impact of default implementation of the gam software on published analyses, the authors reanalyzed data from the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS) using three different methods: 1) Poisson regression with parametric nonlinear adjustments for confounding factors; 2) GAM with default convergence parameters; and 3) GAM with more stringent convergence parameters than the default settings. The authors found that pooled NMMAPS estimates were very similar under the first and third methods but were biased upward under the second method.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwf062

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various regression models and parameter settings affect regression coefficients.

    “Earlier simulation studies have shown that various regression models and parameter setting in the models (e.g. df selection, convergence criteria) would affect the regression coefficients (Dominici et al. 2002; Peng et al. 2006).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 728

Authors
Dominici, F.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Dominici, F.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
156
Issue
3
Pages
193-203
ISSN
0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104610706
Cited by
728
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 22
FWCI
35.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES003819, 5P30ES03819-12)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
generalized additive models, air pollution, air pollution health effects, time series analysis, nonlinear regression, confounding factors, nonparametric smoothing, standard errors, mortality, Poisson regression
MeSH terms
Air Pollution, Algorithms, Health Status, Humans, Morbidity, Mortality, Regression Analysis, United States, Models, Statistical, Epidemiologic Factors, Nonlinear Dynamics, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review