The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the Relative Risk in Cohort Studies and Clinical Trials of Common Outcomes
Abstract
Logistic regression yields an adjusted odds ratio that approximates the adjusted relative risk when disease incidence is rare (<10%), while adjusting for potential confounders. For more common outcomes, the odds ratio always overstates the relative risk, sometimes dramatically. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the incorrect application of a proposed method to estimate an adjusted relative risk from an adjusted odds ratio, which has quickly gained popularity in medical and public health research, and to describe alternative statistical methods for estimating an adjusted relative risk when the outcome is common. Hypothetical data are used to illustrate statistical methods with readily accessible computer software.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications: Second Editon
Rao, C. R. (1973) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316436 · Cited by 10,489
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
Walker, E. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488486 · Cited by 8,538
Zhang, J., & Yu, K. F. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.19.1690 · Cited by 4,138
Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods.
Mayer, L. S., Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Morgenstern, H. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288427 · Cited by 2,905
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods.
Bhattacharyya, H. T., Kleinbaum, D. G., & Kupper, L. L. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287012 · Cited by 1,749
Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications
Johnson, N. L. (1966) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1966.10490390 · Cited by 803
BINOMIAL REGRESSION IN GLIM: ESTIMATING RISK RATIOS AND RISK DIFFERENCES1
WACHOLDER, S. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114212 · Cited by 623
Cited by
Wang, X., Ouyang, Y., Liu, J., Zhu, M., Zhao, G., Bao, W., & Hu, F. B. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g4490 · Cited by 1,596
Ronksley, P. E., Brien, S. E., Turner, B. J., Mukamal, K. J., & Ghali, W. A. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d671 · Cited by 1,610
Active Smoking and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Willi, C., Bodenmann, P., Ghali, W. A., Faris, P. D., & Cornuz, J. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.22.2654 · Cited by 1,268
Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury.
Talmor, D., Sarge, T., Malhotra, A., O'Donnell, C. R., Ritz, R., Lisbon, A., Novack, V., & Loring, S. H. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0708638 · Cited by 1,149
Suurmond, R., van Rhee, H., & Hak, T. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1260 · Cited by 881
Metadata
- Authors
- McNutt, L.-A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05-15
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 940-943
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153941399
- Cited by
- 2,096
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 25.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the Relative Risk in Cohort Studies and Clinical Trials of Common Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwg074
- The paper
- McNutt, L.-A. (2003). Estimating the Relative Risk in Cohort Studies and Clinical Trials of Common Outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.