The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association between Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy-induced Hypertension
Abstract
Gestational diabetes and pregnancy-induced hypertension are common, and their relation is not well understood. The authors conducted a population-based case-control study using 1992-1998 Washington State birth certificate and hospital discharge records to investigate this relation. Consecutive cases of pregnancy-induced hypertension were divided into four groups based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes: eclampsia (n=154), severe preeclampsia (n=1,180), mild preeclampsia (n=5,468), and gestational hypertension (n=8,943). Cases were compared with controls who did not have pregnancy-induced hypertension (n=47,237). Gestational diabetes was more common in each case group (3.9% in eclamptics, 4.5% in severe preeclamptics, and 4.4% in both mild preeclamptics and those with gestational hypertension) than in controls (2.7%). After adjustment for body mass index, age, ethnicity, parity, and prenatal care, gestational diabetes was associated with increased risk of severe preeclampsia (odds ratio (OR)=1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1, 2.1), mild preeclampsia (OR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.3, 1.8), and gestational hypertension (OR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.6). Gestational diabetes was more strongly associated with pregnancy-induced hypertension among women who received less prenatal care (OR=4.2 for eclampsia and OR=3.1 for severe preeclampsia, p<0.05 for both) and among Black women (OR for eclampsia and preeclampsia together=3.9, p<0.05).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Preeclampsia
Eskenazi, B. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470020063033 · Cited by 436
Ros, H. S., Cnattingius, S., & Lipworth, L. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009400 · Cited by 401
Risk Factors for Preeclampsia in Twin Pregnancies: A Population-Based Cohort Study
COONROD, D. (1995) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00049-w · Cited by 173
Cited by
Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis
Ye, W., Luo, C., Huang, J., Li, C., Liu, Z., & Liu, F. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-067946 · Cited by 1,073
Lydon-Rochelle, M. T., Holt, V. L., Cárdenas, V., Nelson, J. C., Easterling, T. R., Gardella, C., & Callaghan, W. M. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.096 · Cited by 332
Lavery, J., Friedman, A., Keyes, K., Wright, J., & Ananth, C. (2017) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14236 · Cited by 275
Baz, B., Riveline, J.-P., & Gautier, J.-F. (2016) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-15-0378 · Cited by 260
Adherence to healthy lifestyle and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: prospective cohort study
Zhang, C., Tobias, D. K., Chavarro, J. E., Bao, W., Wang, D., Ley, S. H., & Hu, F. B. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g5450 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryson, C. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-15
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1148-1153
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118057920
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy-induced Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwg273
- The paper
- Bryson, C. L. (2003). Association between Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy-induced Hypertension. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.