The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Case-Control Study of Bladder Cancer and Drinking Water Arsenic in the Western United States
Abstract
Numerous epidemiologic investigations have identified links between high concentrations of arsenic in drinking water and cancer, although the risks at lower exposures are largely unknown. This paper presents the results of a case-control study of arsenic ingestion and bladder cancer in seven counties in the western United States. These counties contain the largest populations historically exposed to drinking water arsenic at concentrations near 100 microg/liter. All incident cases diagnosed from 1994 to 2000 were recruited. Individual data on water sources, water consumption patterns, smoking, and other factors were collected for 181 cases and 328 controls. Overall, no increased risks were identified for arsenic intakes greater than 80 microg/day (odds ratio=0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.56, 1.57; linear trend, p=0.48). These risks are below predictions based on high dose studies from Taiwan. When the analysis was focused on exposures 40 or more years ago, an odds ratio of 3.67 (95% confidence interval: 1.43, 9.42; linear trend, p<0.01) was identified for intakes greater than 80 microg/day (median intake, 177 microg/day) in smokers. These data provide some evidence that smokers who ingest arsenic at concentrations near 200 microg/day may be at increased risk of bladder cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arsenic Exposure and Toxicology: A Historical Perspective
Hughes, M. F., Beck, B. D., Chen, Y., Lewis, A. S., & Thomas, D. J. (2011) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfr184 · Cited by 1,312
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
(1959) · Nature · doi:10.1038/183650e0 · Cited by 1,252
Human Health Effects From Chronic Arsenic Poisoning–A Review
KAPAJ, S., PETERSON, H., LIBER, K., & BHATTACHARYA, P. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A · doi:10.1080/10934520600873571 · Cited by 937
Chen, Y., Graziano, J. H., Parvez, F., Liu, M., Slavkovich, V., Kalra, T., Argos, M., Islam, T., Ahmed, A., Rakibuz-Zaman, M., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d2431 · Cited by 454
Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers
Lokeshwar, V. B., Habuchi, T., Grossman, H. B., Murphy, W. M., Hautmann, S. H., Hemstreet, G. P., Bono, A. V., Getzenberg, R. H., Goebell, P., Schmitz-Dräger, B. J., et al. (2005) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.064 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinmaus, C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-15
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1193-1201
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110244716
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Case-Control Study of Bladder Cancer and Drinking Water Arsenic in the Western United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwg281
- The paper
- Steinmaus, C. (2003). Case-Control Study of Bladder Cancer and Drinking Water Arsenic in the Western United States. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.