Cited by 346Diabetes Management and EducationMental Health Treatment and AccessHealth disparities and outcomes

Depressive Symptoms and Mortality among Persons with and without Diabetes

Zhang, X.·2005·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Although people with diabetes mellitus have a high risk of depression and depression may increase mortality among people with other conditions, the impact of depression on mortality risk among people with diabetes needs further examination. Using survival analysis, the authors analyzed longitudinal data from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (1982-1992). The findings showed that the presence of severe depressive symptoms significantly elevated mortality risk among US adults with diabetes; the same pattern was not observed among people without diabetes. After results were controlled for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health-status variables, diabetic persons with Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale scores of 16 or more had 54% greater mortality than those with scores under 16 (p = 0.004). After exclusion of participants who died during the first year of follow-up, mortality remained higher among those with CES-D scores greater than or equal to 22 as compared with those with CES-D scores less than 16, but not among those with CES-D scores between 16 and 21. No significant relation between depression and mortality was found in the nondiabetic population. This analysis indicates that diabetes modifies the effect of depression on mortality. It also demonstrates the importance of observing subgroups, rather than aggregated populations, when examining the effect of depression on mortality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwi089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive-emotion interventions are accessible and effective for people who already have depression, not only for those with good mental health.

    “This adds to the growing evidence that interventions based on positive emotions are accessible and effective even for individuals already experiencing depression[75], rather than being restricted to those who are doing well.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 346

Authors
Zhang, X.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, X.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2005-04-01
Volume
161
Issue
7
Pages
652-660
ISSN
0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120748068
Cited by
346
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 29
FWCI
12.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
depressive symptoms, diabetes mellitus, mortality, depression and mortality, CES-D scale, NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Risk Factors, United States, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review