Depressive Symptoms and Mortality among Persons with and without Diabetes
Abstract
Although people with diabetes mellitus have a high risk of depression and depression may increase mortality among people with other conditions, the impact of depression on mortality risk among people with diabetes needs further examination. Using survival analysis, the authors analyzed longitudinal data from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (1982-1992). The findings showed that the presence of severe depressive symptoms significantly elevated mortality risk among US adults with diabetes; the same pattern was not observed among people without diabetes. After results were controlled for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health-status variables, diabetic persons with Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale scores of 16 or more had 54% greater mortality than those with scores under 16 (p = 0.004). After exclusion of participants who died during the first year of follow-up, mortality remained higher among those with CES-D scores greater than or equal to 22 as compared with those with CES-D scores less than 16, but not among those with CES-D scores between 16 and 21. No significant relation between depression and mortality was found in the nondiabetic population. This analysis indicates that diabetes modifies the effect of depression on mortality. It also demonstrates the importance of observing subgroups, rather than aggregated populations, when examining the effect of depression on mortality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive-emotion interventions are accessible and effective for people who already have depression, not only for those with good mental health.
“This adds to the growing evidence that interventions based on positive emotions are accessible and effective even for individuals already experiencing depression[75], rather than being restricted to those who are doing well.”
From An online positive affect skills intervention reduces depression in adults with type 2 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [75]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 346
- Authors
- Zhang, X.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, X.
- ORCID
- Zhang, X.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 652-660
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120748068
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- depressive symptoms, diabetes mellitus, mortality, depression and mortality, CES-D scale, NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Risk Factors, United States, Proportional Hazards Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review