Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,738

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Easy SAS Calculations for Risk or Prevalence Ratios and Differences

Spiegelman, D.·2005·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

We would like to make the readership aware that risk or prevalence ratios and differences, when they are the parameter of interest, can be directly calculated by using SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina). There is no longer any good justification for fitting logistic regression models and estimating odds ratios when the odds ratio is not a good approximation of the risk or prevalence ratio. Instead, SAS PROC GENMOD's log-binomial regression (1) capability can be used for estimation and inference about the parameter of interest. Here is an example of the code required to analyze the breast cancer survival data discussed by Greenland (2):from which the multivariate-adjusted risk ratios are 1.5583 (95 percent confidence interval: 1.0487, 2.3155), 2.5382 (95 percent confidence interval: 1.1734, 5.4903), and 5.8680 (95 percent confidence interval: 2.7458, 12.5406) for receptor, stage2, and stage3, respectively. The results from the SAS output are given without rounding to allow replication by the reader.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwi188

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,738

Metadata

Authors
Spiegelman, D.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2005-06-29
Volume
162
Issue
3
Pages
199-200
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2137635384
Cited by
1,738
References
0
FWCI
52.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Easy SAS Calculations for Risk or Prevalence Ratios and Differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwi188
The paper
Spiegelman, D. (2005). Easy SAS Calculations for Risk or Prevalence Ratios and Differences. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi188

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.