Multiparameter calibration of a natural history model of cervical cancer
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive natural history model of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer using a two-step approach to model calibration. In the first step, the authors utilized primary epidemiologic data from a longitudinal study of women in Brazil and identified a plausible range for each input parameter that produced model output within the 95% confidence intervals of the data. In the second step, they performed a simultaneous search over all input parameters to identify parameter sets that produced output consistent with data from multiple sources. A goodness-of-fit score was computed for 555,000 unique parameter sets using a likelihood-based approach, and a sample of good-fitting parameter sets was used in the model to illustrate the advantage of the calibration approach by projecting a range of benefits associated with cervical cancer prevention policies. The calibrated model had reasonable fit to the data in terms of duration and prevalence of HPV infection for high-risk types, prevalence of precancerous lesions, and incidence of cancer. The authors found that leveraging primary data from longitudinal studies provides unique opportunities for model parameterization of the unobservable nature of HPV infection and its role in the development of cervical cancer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For more complex models, standard calibration approaches can be applied to identify the best fitting set of inputs, or multiple sets of values, which can then form the basis for uncertainty analysis.
“For more complex models, standard calibration approaches can be applied to identify the best fitting set of inputs, or multiple sets of values, which can then form the basis for uncertainty analysis [18 -21].”
From Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6 (2012) · cites this paper as [20]
The Markov model was based on previously published and validated models for cervical cancer.
“Based on the previously published and validated models for cervical cancer, we developed a markov model on MS Excel spread sheet, considering the natural history of HPV infection and cervical cancer (Fig 1). [12–15]”
From Cost effectiveness of strategies for cervical cancer prevention in India (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
Myers, E. R., McCrory, D. C., Nanda, K., Bastian, L., & Matchar, D. B. (2000) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010166 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Briggs, A. H., Weinstein, M. C., Fenwick, E. A. L., Karnon, J., Sculpher, M. J., & Paltiel, A. D. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.014 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Kim, J. J., Andres-Beck, B., & Goldie, S. J. (2007) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604023 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationHealth and economic impact of HPV 16 and 18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in India
Diaz, M., Kim, J. J., Albero, G., de Sanjosé, S., Clifford, G., Bosch, F. X., & Goldie, S. J. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604462 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“A previously described computer-based model of cervical carcinogenesis (Goldie et al, 2007; Kim et al, 2007a) was calibrated to epidemiologic data in India and used to compare the health (cancer incidence reduction, life expectancy gains) and economic (discounted lifetime costs) impact of the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationCost effectiveness of strategies for cervical cancer prevention in India
Chauhan, A. S., Prinja, S., Srinivasan, R., Rai, B., Malliga, J., Jyani, G., Gupta, N., & Ghoshal, S. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238291 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“[12, 16] It was assumed that patients in undiagnosed cervical carcinoma can die due to cancer, only after progressing through all the stages of the cancer (as per natural history of the cervical cancer) and within the first year of moving into the stage 4.”
Background
- Authors
- Kim, J. J., Kuntz, K. M., Stout, N. K., Mahmud, S., Villa, L. L., Franco, E. L., & Goldie, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-06-07
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-150
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2129363191
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA093435, CA70269, CA93435, R01CA070269)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Keywords
- cervical cancer, human papillomavirus, natural history model, model calibration, parameter estimation, precancerous lesions, cervical cancer incidence
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brazil, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Monte Carlo Method, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Papillomavirus Infections, Human papillomavirus 16, Papillomavirus Vaccines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review