The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Socioeconomic Status in Relation to Selected Birth Defects in a Large Multicentered US Case-Control Study
Abstract
This study examined individual and household socioeconomic status (SES) in relation to phenotypes of neural tube defects, orafacial clefts, and conotruncal heart defects using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study with 2,551 nonmalformed liveborn controls and 1,841 cases delivered in 1997-2000. The individual SES was measured by maternal and paternal education, occupation, and household income. All individual SES measures were combined to create a household SES index. Elevated risks were found for maternal low education in association with anencephaly and dextrotransposition of the great arteries (dTGA) (adjusted odds ratios (AORs) > or = 1.4); paternal low education in association with anencephaly, cleft palate, tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), and dTGA (AORs > or = 1.4); low household income in association with TOF (AOR = 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8, 2.5); maternal operator/laborer occupation in association with cleft palate, TOF, and dTGA (AORs > or = 1.4); paternal operator/laborer occupation in association with spina bifida (AOR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0, 2.0); and either parent's unemployment in association with dTGA (AOR > or = 1.4). Subjects with the lowest household SES index had the greatest risks of all selected birth defects except TOF. This study reveals consistently increased risks of selected birth defects in association with household SES index but not individual SES measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wehby, G., & Cassell, C. (2010) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01588.x · Cited by 441
Epidemiologic and genetic aspects of spina bifida and other neural tube defects
Au, K. S., Ashley‐Koch, A., & Northrup, H. (2010) · Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/ddrr.93 · Cited by 344
Corticosteroid use during pregnancy and risk of orofacial clefts
Hviid, A., & Molgaard-Nielsen, D. (2011) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.101063 · Cited by 287
Agha, M. M., Glazier, R. H., Moineddin, R., Moore, A. M., & Guttmann, A. (2011) · Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology · doi:10.1002/bdra.22857 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J., Carmichael, S. L., Canfield, M., Song, J., Shaw, G. M., & Study, T. N. B. D. P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-10-17
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-154
- ISSN
- 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-6256
- OpenAlex
- W2150766039
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socioeconomic Status in Relation to Selected Birth Defects in a Large Multicentered US Case-Control Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwm283
- The paper
- Yang, J., Carmichael, S. L., Canfield, M., Song, J., Shaw, G. M., & Study, T. N. B. D. P. (2007). Socioeconomic Status in Relation to Selected Birth Defects in a Large Multicentered US Case-Control Study. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.