Cited by 255Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm CarePreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 183 of the 183 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Causes Racial Disparities in Very Preterm Birth? A Biosocial Perspective

Open access
Kramer, M. R., Hogue, C. R.·2009·Epidemiologic Reviews

Abstract

Very preterm birth (<32 weeks' gestation) occurs in approximately 2% of livebirths but is a leading cause of infant mortality and morbidity in the United States. African-American women have a 2-fold to 3-fold elevated risk compared with non-Hispanic white women for reasons that are incompletely understood. This paper reviews the evidence for the biologic and social patterning of very preterm birth, with attention to leading hypotheses regarding the etiology of the racial disparity. A systematic review of the literature in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and EMBASE indices was conducted. The literature to date suggests a complex, multifactorial causal framework for understanding racial disparities in very preterm birth, with maternal inflammatory, vascular, or neuroendocrine dysfunction as proximal pathways and maternal exposure to stress, racial differences in preconceptional health, and genetic, epigenetic, and gene-environment interactions as more distal mediators. Interpersonal and institutionalized racism are mechanisms that may drive racially patterned differences. Current literature is limited in that research on social determinants and biologic processes of prematurity has been generally disconnected. Improved etiologic understanding and the potential for effective intervention may come with better integration of these research approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajerev/mxp003

Cites

183 of 183 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 183 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Geronimus, 1992, Ethnicity & disease, 2, 207
  2. 2005, 30, 724
  3. Ness, 2003, Journal of the National Medical Association, 95, 201
  4. 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 197, 477
  5. 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 196, 131
  6. 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 197, 409
  7. Casey, 2006, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control, 55, 1
  8. 2007, MMWR. Surveillance summaries : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries / CDC, 56, 1
  9. MUELLER-HEUBACH, 1990, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 75, 622
  10. 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 197, 367
  11. 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 169, 352
  12. 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 200, 209
  13. 2008, 8, 130

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 254

Metadata

Authors
Kramer, M. R., & Hogue, C. R.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Epidemiologic Reviews
Published
2009-05-28
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
84-98
ISSN
  • 0193-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6729
OpenAlex
W2165878225
Cited by
255
References
183
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiologic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (T03MC07651)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD052460)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Keywords
very preterm birth, racial disparities, African American women, biosocial model, maternal inflammation, neuroendocrine dysfunction, maternal stress, epigenetics, gene-environment interaction, institutional racism, interpersonal racism, social determinants of health
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological, United States, Racial Groups, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review