Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Hypertension

Liu, Xing, Zhang, Qing, Wu, Hongmei, Du, Huanmin, Liu, Li, Shi, Hongbin, Wang, Chongjin, Xia, Yang, Guo, Xiaoyan, Li, Chunlei, Bao, Xue, Su, Qian, Sun, Shaomei, Wang, Xing, Zhou, Ming, Jia, Qiyu, Zhao, Honglin, Song, Kun, Niu, Kaijun·2015·American Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a significant global public health challenge. Low-grade inflammation is known to facilitate the development of essential hypertension and target-organ hypertensive damage. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and reliable indicator of inflammation that may also be useful in the prediction of hypertension. METHODS: Participants were recruited from Tianjin Medical University's General Hospital-Health Management Centre. A total of 28,850 initially hypertension-free subjects were followed from 2007 to 2013. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess relationships between NLR categories and incidence of hypertension. RESULTS: During the ~6-year follow-up period (median duration of follow-up (interquartile range): 2.63 (2.58-2.68)), 1,824 subjects developed hypertension. The hazard ratios of hypertension incidence were evaluated in increasing NLR quintiles. Compared with participants with the lowest NLR levels, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of hypertension were related to increasing NLR quintiles and were as follows: 1.08 (0.92, 1.26), 0.97 (0.83, 1.14), 1.10 (0.94, 1.28), and 1.23 (1.06, 1.43), respectively (P for trend < 0.01). Similar results also were observed in the white blood cell and neutrophil counts, but not lymphocyte counts. CONCLUSIONS: The study is the first to show the elevated NLR levels significantly correlate with an increased risk of developing hypertension. This result may be useful in elucidating the mechanism underlying the development of hypertension. New therapeutic approaches aimed at inflammation might be proposed to control hypertension and hypertensive damage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajh/hpv034

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Zhang, Q., Wu, H., Du, H., Liu, L., Shi, H., Wang, C., Xia, Y., Guo, X., Li, C., Bao, X., Su, Q., Sun, S., Wang, X., Zhou, M., Jia, Q., Zhao, H., Song, K., & Niu, K.
Venue
American Journal of Hypertension
Published
2015-03-30
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
1339-1346
ISSN
  • 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7225
OpenAlex
W2054832805
Cited by
173
References
3
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ajh/hpv034
The paper
Liu, X., Zhang, Q., Wu, H., Du, H., Liu, L., Shi, H., Wang, C., Xia, Y., Guo, X., Li, C., Bao, X., Su, Q., Sun, S., Wang, X., Zhou, M., Jia, Q., Zhao, H., Song, K., & Niu, K. (2015). Blood Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Hypertension. American Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpv034

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.