Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension-Related Multi-morbidity: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) is effective when combined with co-interventions, but its efficacy varies in the presence of some co-morbidities. This study examined whether self-monitoring can reduce clinic BP in patients with hypertension-related co-morbidity. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of articles published in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2018. Randomized controlled trials of self-monitoring of BP were selected and individual patient data (IPD) were requested. Contributing studies were prospectively categorized by whether they examined a low/high-intensity co-intervention. Change in BP and likelihood of uncontrolled BP at 12 months were examined according to number and type of hypertension-related co-morbidity in a one-stage IPD meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 22 trials were eligible, 16 of which were able to provide IPD for the primary outcome, including 6,522 (89%) participants with follow-up data. Self-monitoring was associated with reduced clinic systolic BP compared to usual care at 12-month follow-up, regardless of the number of hypertension-related co-morbidities (−3.12 mm Hg, [95% confidence intervals −4.78, −1.46 mm Hg]; P value for interaction with number of morbidities = 0.260). Intense interventions were more effective than low-intensity interventions in patients with obesity (P < 0.001 for all outcomes), and possibly stroke (P < 0.004 for BP control outcome only), but this effect was not observed in patients with coronary heart disease, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: Self-monitoring lowers BP regardless of the number of hypertension-related co-morbidities, but may only be effective in conditions such obesity or stroke when combined with high-intensity co-interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BP self-monitoring has effectively promoted BP control, at the expense of medication titration or increased adherence to BP-lowering medications.
“With or without mHealth support, BP self-monitoring has effectively promoted BP control, at the expense of medication titration or increased adherence to BP-lowering medications [15,32,33].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 108
- Authors
- Sheppard, J. P., Tucker, K. L., Davison, W. J., Stevens, R., Aekplakorn, W., Bosworth, H. B., Bove, A., Earle, K., Godwin, M., Green, B. B., Hebert, P., Heneghan, C., Hill, N., Hobbs, F. D. R., Kantola, I., Kerry, S. M., Leiva, A., Magid, D. J., Mant, J., Margolis, K. L., McKinstry, B., McLaughlin, M. A., McNamara, K., Omboni, S., Ogedegbe, O., Parati, G., Varis, J., Verberk, W. J., Wakefield, B. J., & McManus, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- Mahidol University (TH)
- Duke University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford , Oxford, United Kingdom
- University of Turku (FI)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Servei de Salut de les Illes Balears (ES)
- Colorado School of Public Health (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- HealthPartners (US)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University , Parkville, Australia
- Sechenov University (RU)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Iowa City VA Health Care System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tucker, K L
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Hypertension
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-11-15
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 243-251
- ISSN
- 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7225
- PMC
- PMC7162426
- OpenAlex
- W2986656579
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
- St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
- Docusalut (Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research
- National Institute for Health Research Professorship
- Wellcome Trust
- Royal Society Sir Henry Dale Fellowship
- National Institute for Health Research
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL070713)
- School for Primary Care Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- self-measured blood pressure, hypertension, multimorbidity, obesity, stroke, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, blood pressure control, co-interventions, systolic blood pressure
- MeSH terms
- Multimorbidity, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Self Care, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review