DO ALCOHOL EXPECTANCIES AND PEER DELINQUENCY/SUBSTANCE USE MEDIATE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IMPULSIVITY AND DRINKING BEHAVIOUR IN ADOLESCENCE?
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate (1). whether aggressive and delinquent behaviour problems predict subsequent adolescent drinking behaviour; and (2). to what extent this association is mediated by alcohol expectancies and/or peer delinquency/substance use. METHODS: 147 adolescents (approximately 15 years old) were interviewed with regard to their drinking behaviour. In addition, several self-rating questionnaires were given to gather information regarding the peers of these children. RESULTS: As proposed by the Acquired Preparedness Model (APM), we found that behavioural problems were related to quantity and frequency of alcohol consumed, and that this relationship was mediated by alcohol expectancies. Regarding peer relations, we found positive correlations between drinking behaviour and peer delinquency/substance use, aggression/delinquency and alcohol expectancies. Furthermore, the association between behavioural problems and drinking decreased dramatically if peer delinquency/substance use was accounted for. A hierarchical regression analysis revealed that both alcohol expectancies and peer delinquency/substance use predicted alcohol consumption of adolescents at the 1-year follow-up above and beyond the effects of age, sex, family history of alcoholism and aggression/delinquency of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol expectancies and peer delinquency/substance use are both crucial to the amount and frequency of adolescent alcohol use. They should be considered in designing prevention and intervention strategies in this age group.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with these predispositions often select environments that amplify risk, gravitating toward high-risk settings or deviant peer groups that reinforce impulsivity and antisocial tendencies.
“Individuals with these predispositions often select environments that amplify risk, gravitating toward high-risk settings or deviant peer groups that reinforce impulsivity and antisocial tendencies (Barnow et al. 2004; Kendler et al. 2008).”
From Decoding the bidirectional links between alcohol misuse and aggression: toward a unified translational framework (2026) · cites this paper as Barnow et al. 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- Barnow, S.
- Affiliations
- Universität Greifswald (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Barnow, S.
- ORCID
- Barnow, S.
- Venue
- Alcohol and Alcoholism
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-219
- ISSN
- 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3502
- OpenAlex
- W2102732642
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- adolescent alcohol use, alcohol expectancies, peer delinquency, peer substance use, aggression, impulsivity, mediation, drinking frequency, alcohol consumption quantity, family history of alcoholism, prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Peer Group, Regression Analysis, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review