Cited by 29Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Long-term effect of brief intervention in at-risk alcohol drinkers: a 9-year follow-up study.

NILSSEN, ODD·2004·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

Aims In 1986, 338 men and women attending a general population screening study were identified as at-risk alcohol drinkers and randomly assigned into three groups. Two groups received slightly different, brief interventions; a third group served as control. After 1 year there was a 50% reduction in alcohol intake in the intervention groups and a 20% increase in the control group. Controls then received advice to reduce their drinking. This study evaluates outcomes 9 years after these interventions. Methods In a survey in the same city in 1995 (over 27 000 participants), 247 subjects (73.1%) from the 1986 study, were re-assessed. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) was examined and compared with values in 1986. A 'pseudo-control' group was established to compare 'treated' and 'untreated'. Results After 9 years, the original study groups displayed significant mean reduction in GGT. The reductions achieved in the three groups did not significantly differ from each other. However, the reductions were significantly greater than that in the 'pseudo-control' group. Conclusion The impact of brief intervention appears to be long lasting. At 9 years follow-up, the at-risk drinkers displayed GGT values close to that of the background population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agh095

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work indicates that brief interventions lower drinking and improve outcomes in people with hazardous or harmful alcohol use.

    “Brief interventions (BI) have been shown to reduce alcohol use and improve outcomes in Hazardous and Harmful (HH) drinkers but evidence to support their use in emergency department (ED) patients is limited.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NILSSEN, O.
Affiliations
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
NILSSEN, ODD
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2004-09-20
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
548-551
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2007948694
Cited by
29
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
brief intervention, long-term follow-up, alcohol consumption reduction, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alcoholic liver disease, alcohol screening, sustained intervention effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Female, Follow-Up Studies, gamma-Glutamyltransferase, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Risk Factors, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review