The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
Abstract
Journal Article Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Get access Edmund L. Gettier Edmund L. Gettier Wayne State University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Analysis, Volume 23, Issue 6, June 1963, Pages 121–123, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121 Published: 01 June 1963
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account
Santoni de Sio, F., & van den Hoven, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00015 · Cited by 566
“But they are open to so-called Gettier counterexamples which present believable cases where the conditions are all satisfied, i.e., where we have true justified belief, but we still do not think there is knowledge (Gettier, 1963).”
BackgroundFallis, D. (2015) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2015.0014 · Cited by 511
Wedgwood, R. (2002) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.10 · Cited by 279
How Explainability Contributes to Trust in AI
Ferrario, A., & Loi, M. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533202 · Cited by 163
Sandoval, W. A., Greene, J. A., & Bråten, I. (2016) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x16669319 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Gettier, E. L.
- Venue
- Analysis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1963-06-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 121-123
- ISSN
- 0003-2638 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8284
- OpenAlex
- W1966129247
- Cited by
- 3,127
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/analys/23.6.121
- The paper
- Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/23.6.121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
