Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preliminary Findings for Pleural Mesothelioma among Women in the Quebec Chrysotile Mining Regions

Case, B. W., Camus, M., Richardson, L., Parent, M.-E., Desy, M., Siemiatycki, J.·2002·Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Abstract

Introduction. We conducted a descriptive study to compare cases of pleural mesothelioma among female residents of Québec's asbestos mining regions to matched controls for residential, domestic and occupational asbestos exposures. Methods. We visited hospitals throughout the province of Québec to identify women aged ≥50 yr whose hospital records mentioned any possible mesothelioma between 1970 and 1989. Hospital records and biological materials were reviewed by three expert pathologists to identify individuals who had lived in a mining region in Québec at the time of diagnosis. For each case, 15 controls matched for year (±2) of birth and area of residence were selected from a previously interviewed sample of 817 female asbestos mining area residents alive in 1989. Relatives of the cases were similarly interviewed regarding lifetime occupational and residential histories and cohabitation with asbestos worker(s). Cumulative exposure from each source was estimated in fibers/ml-yr from indirect data. Results. We identified six ‘definite or probable’ and four ‘possible’ pleural mesothelioma cases. All resided in Thetford Mines (none in the town of Asbestos) and were born before 1935. Five cases (50%) worked in the asbestos industry (versus 2.7% of controls; relative risk = 53.8). Nine (90%) had lived with one or more asbestos workers (versus 65% of controls); six (60%) with two or more workers (versus 36% of controls). Mean cumulative exposure (residential, domestic, and occupatio…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annhyg/46.suppl_1.128

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Case, B. W., Camus, M., Richardson, L., Parent, M.-E., Desy, M., & Siemiatycki, J.
Venue
Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
46
Issue
Suppl. 1
Pages
128-131
ISSN
  • 0003-4878
  • 1475-3162
Cited by
13
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.