The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Subchronic Studies on Man-Made Vitreous Fibres: Kinetics of Inhaled Particles
Abstract
After subchronic exposure of rats to different fibre types [calcium magnesium silicate fibre, calcium magnesium zirconia silicate fibre, refractory ceramic fibre (RCF), non-fibrous material of that RCF and long amosite] lung fibre burden accumulation was proportional to biopersistence. The lung burden of non-fibrous particulate was so pronounced (>2 μl/lung) that macrophage clearance collapsed and considerable inflammation occurred. The effects of the three vitreous fibres also correlated with effects on clearance. A fibre (RCF) with the same composition as the particles accumulated to a similar mass/volume level but had less effect. Amosite fibres accumulated more than the other test materials investigated, mostly in the interstitial tissue, but produced only a small effect on clearance of labelled particles, however, amosite had the highest effect on cell proliferation. The toxicity results of this study are presented in an accompanying paper.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the shorter fibers (>5 μm versus > 20 μm) appear less persistent [99,100].”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [99]
In the citing paper
“Two studies carried out with crocidolite and amosite fibers demonstrated that the percentage of retention for fibers > 20 μm was greater than that of fibers > 5 μm [99,100] .”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [99]
Citations
Cited by
Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
Bernstein, D., Castranova, V., Donaldson, K., Fubini, B., Hadley, J., Hesterberg, T., Kane, A., Lai, D., McConnell, E. E., Muhle, H., et al. (2005) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370591001121 · Cited by 103
Self-citation
Metadata
- Venue
- The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- ISSN
- 1475-3162
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
