Cited by 21Infection Control and VentilationOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesOccupational Health and Performance

Evaluation of Particulate Filtering Respirators Using Inward Leakage (IL) or Total Inward Leakage (TIL) Testing—Korean Experience

Don‐Hee Han, Jinheon Lee·2005·The Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Abstract

Korean certification regulation for particulate filtering respirators requires inward leakage (IL) or total inward leakage (TIL) testing according to European Standard EN 13274-1, and the standard levels of compliance are similar to those of the European Standard. This study was conducted to evaluate particulate filtering respirators being commercially used in the Korean market using an IL or TIL test and the validity of standard level in Korea. Three half masks and 10 filtering facepieces (two top class, four 1st class and four 2nd class)-a total of 13 brand name respirators-were selected for the test with panels of 10 subjects. Each subject was classified with nine facial dimension grid squares in accordance with face length and lip length. IL or TIL testing was conducted at the laboratory of the 3M Innovation Center in which the experimental instruments and systems were established in compliance with European standards. The testing procedure followed EN 13274-1 (2001). As expected, leakages of half masks were less than those of filtering facepieces and the latter were significantly different among brands. TILs of the 1st class filtering facepieces were found to be much more than those of the 2nd class and the result may cause a wearer to get confused when selecting a mask. The main route leakage for filtering facepieces may not be the filter medium but the face seal. Therefore, it is necessary to develop well-fitting filtering facepieces for Koreans. Because leakages were significantly different for different facial dimensions, a defined test panel for IL or TIL testing according to country or race should be developed. A more precise method to demonstrate fit, for example, fit testing such as in the US regulations, will be needed before IL or TIL testing or when selecting a respirator. Another finding implies that geometric mean of five exercises for IL or TIL may be better than arithmetic mean to establish a standard individual subject mean.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annhyg/mei034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, D., & Lee, J.
Affiliations
Inje University (KR)
Corresponding author
Don‐Hee Han
Venue
The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Published
2005-08-26
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
569-74
ISSN
  • 0003-4878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3162
OpenAlex
W2131728139
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of Occupational Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
facial dimensions, face seals, respirator fit, respirator selection, Korean market
MeSH terms
Equipment Design, Face, Humans, Korea, Licensure, Masks, Reference Standards, Respiratory Protective Devices, Occupational Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review