Cited by 26Occupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactOccupational Health and Performance

Predictors of Dermal Exposures to Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds Among Hot-Mix Asphalt Paving Workers

Jennifer M. Cavallari, Linda V. Osborn, JOHN E. SNAWDER, Anthony J. Kriech, Larry D. Olsen, Robert F. Herrick, Michael D. McClean·2011·The Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to identify the source and work practices that affect dermal exposure to polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) among hot-mix asphalt (HMA) paving workers. METHODS: Four workers were recruited from each of three asphalt paving crews (12 workers) and were monitored for three consecutive days over 4 weeks for a total of 12 sampling days per worker (144 worker days). Two sampling weeks were conducted under standard conditions for dermal exposures. The third week included the substitution of biodiesel for diesel oil used to clean tools and equipment and the fourth week included dermal protection through the use of gloves, hat and neck cloth, clean pants, and long-sleeved shirts. Dermal exposure to PACs was quantified using two methods: a passive organic dermal (POD) sampler specifically developed for this study and a sunflower oil hand wash technique. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate predictors of PAC exposures. RESULTS: Dermal exposures measured under all conditions via POD and hand wash were low with most samples for each analyte being below the limit of the detection with the exception of phenanthrene and pyrene. The geometric mean (GM) concentrations of phenanthrene were 0.69 ng cm(-2) on the polypropylene layer of the POD sampler and 1.37 ng cm(-2) in the hand wash sample. The GM concentrations of pyrene were 0.30 ng cm(-2) on the polypropylene layer of the POD sampler and 0.29 ng cm(-2) in the hand wash sample. Both the biodiesel substitution and dermal protection scenarios were effective in reducing dermal exposures. Based on the results of multivariate linear mixed-effects models, increasing frequency of glove use was associated with significant (P < 0.0001) reductions for hand wash and POD phenanthrene and pyrene concentrations; percent reductions ranged from 40 to 90%. Similar reductions in hand wash concentrations of phenanthrene (P = 0.01) and pyrene (P = 0.003) were observed when biodiesel was substituted for diesel oil as a cleaning agent, although reductions were not significant for the POD sampler data. Although task was not a predictor of dermal exposure, job site characteristics such as HMA application temperature, asphalt grade, and asphalt application rate (tons per hour) were found to significantly affect exposure. Predictive models suggest that the combined effect of substituting biodiesel for diesel oil as a cleaning agent, frequent glove use, and reducing the HMA application temperature from 149°C (300°F) to 127°C (260°F) may reduce dermal exposures by 76-86%, varying by analyte and assessment method. CONCLUSIONS: Promising strategies for reducing dermal exposure to PACs among asphalt paving workers include requiring the use of dermal coverage (e.g. wearing gloves and/or long sleeves), substituting biodiesel for diesel oil as a cleaning agent, and decreasing the HMA application temperature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annhyg/mer108

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dermal uptake is a direct route of pollutant contamination.

    “These studies all indicate that dermal uptake is a direct route of pollutant contamination (Fig. 1).”

    From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavallari, J. M., Osborn, L. V., SNAWDER, J. E., Kriech, A. J., Olsen, L. D., Herrick, R. F., & McClean, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Jennifer M. Cavallari
Venue
The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Published
2011-12-08
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
125-37
ISSN
  • 0003-4878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3162
OpenAlex
W2107486379
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of Occupational Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
polycyclic aromatic compounds, phenanthrene, pyrene, glove use, personal protective equipment, exposure predictors, asphalt grade, occupational exposure, exposure reduction strategies
MeSH terms
Adult, Air Pollutants, Occupational, Construction Materials, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Hydrocarbons, Male, Middle Aged, Polycyclic Compounds, Skin Absorption, Cohort Studies, Occupational Exposure, Young Adult, Biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review