Cited by 124Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies

Adding cetuximab to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research SAKK

Open access
Borner, M., Koeberle, D., Von Moos, R., Saletti, P., Rauch, D., Hess, V., Trojan, A., Helbling, D. +8 more·2008·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background To determine the activity and tolerability of adding cetuximab to the oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) combination in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).Patients and methods In a multicenter two-arm phase II trial, patients were randomized to receive oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks alone or in combination with standard dose cetuximab. Treatment was limited to a maximum of six cycles.Results Seventy-four patients with good performance status entered the trial. Objective partial response rates after external review and radiological confirmation were 14% and 41% in the XELOX and in the XELOX + Cetuximab arm, respectively. Stable disease has been observed in 62% and 35% of the patients, with 76% disease control in both arms. Cetuximab led to skin rash in 65% of the patients. The median overall survival was 16.5 months for arm A and 20.5 months for arm B. The median time to progression was 5.8 months for arm A and 7.2 months for arm B.Conclusion Differences in response rates between the treatment arms indicate that cetuximab may improve outcome with XELOX. The correct place of the cetuximab, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combinations in first-line treatment of MCC has to be assessed in phase III trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdn058

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 124

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. original article Annals of Oncology 1292 | Borner et al. Volume 19 | No. 7 | July 2008

Authors
Borner, M., Koeberle, D., Von Moos, R., Saletti, P., Rauch, D., Hess, V., Trojan, A., Helbling, D., Pestalozzi, B., Caspar, C., Ruhstaller, T., Roth, A., Kappeler, A., Dietrich, D., Lanz, D., & Mingrone, W.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Borner, M.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
1288-1292
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110097275
Cited by
124
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (acceptedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Keywords
cetuximab, capecitabine, oxaliplatin, XELOX, metastatic colorectal cancer, first-line therapy, EGFR inhibitors, fluoropyrimidine, rash, overall survival, time to progression, disease control
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Oxaliplatin, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Drug Administration Schedule, Exanthema, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Organoplatinum Compounds, Radiography, Switzerland, Time Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review