Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The prognostic and predictive value of serum CA19.9 in pancreatic cancer

Open access
Humphris, J.L., Chang, D.K., Johns, A.L., Scarlett, C.J., Pajic, M., Jones, M.D., Colvin, E.K., Nagrial, A., Chin, V.T., Chantrill, L.A., Samra, J.S., Gill, A.J., Kench, J.G., Merrett, N.D., Das, A., Musgrove, E.A., Sutherland, R.L., Biankin, A.V.·2012·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current staging methods for pancreatic cancer (PC) are inadequate, and biomarkers to aid clinical decision making are lacking. Despite the availability of the serum marker carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) for over two decades, its precise role in the management of PC is yet to be defined, and as a consequence, it is not widely used. METHODS: We assessed the relationship between perioperative serum CA19.9 levels, survival and adjuvant chemotherapeutic responsiveness in a cohort of 260 patients who underwent operative resection for PC. RESULTS: By specifically assessing the subgroup of patients with detectable CA19.9, we identified potential utility at key clinical decision points. Low postoperative CA19.9 at 3 months (median survival 25.6 vs 14.8 months, P=0.0052) and before adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Patients with postoperative CA 19.9 levels>90 U/ml did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.7194) compared with those with a CA19.9 of ≤90 U/ml (median 26.0 vs 16.7 months, P=0.0108). Normalization of CA19.9 within 6 months of resection was also an independent favorable prognostic factor (median 29.9 vs 14.8 months, P=0.0004) and normal perioperative CA19.9 levels identified a good prognostic group, which was associated with a 5-year survival of 42%. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative serum CA19.9 measurements are informative in patients with detectable CA19.9 (defined by serum levels of >5 U/ml) and have potential clinical utility in predicting outcome and response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Future clinical trials should prioritize incorporation of CA19.9 measurement at key decision points to prospectively validate these findings and facilitate implementation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdr561

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Humphris, J. L., Chang, D. K., Johns, A. L., Scarlett, C. J., Pajic, M., Jones, M. D., Colvin, E. K., Nagrial, A., Chin, V. T., Chantrill, L. A., Samra, J. S., Gill, A. J., Kench, J. G., Merrett, N. D., Das, A., Musgrove, E. A., Sutherland, R. L., & Biankin, A. V.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
1713-1722
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136339108
Cited by
312
References
0
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prognostic and predictive value of serum CA19.9 in pancreatic cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdr561
The paper
Humphris, J. L., Chang, D. K., Johns, A. L., Scarlett, C. J., Pajic, M., Jones, M. D., Colvin, E. K., Nagrial, A., Chin, V. T., Chantrill, L. A., Samra, J. S., Gill, A. J., Kench, J. G., Merrett, N. D., Das, A., Musgrove, E. A., Sutherland, R. L., & Biankin, A. V. (2012). The prognostic and predictive value of serum CA19.9 in pancreatic cancer. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr561

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.