The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The prognostic and predictive value of serum CA19.9 in pancreatic cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Current staging methods for pancreatic cancer (PC) are inadequate, and biomarkers to aid clinical decision making are lacking. Despite the availability of the serum marker carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19.9) for over two decades, its precise role in the management of PC is yet to be defined, and as a consequence, it is not widely used. METHODS: We assessed the relationship between perioperative serum CA19.9 levels, survival and adjuvant chemotherapeutic responsiveness in a cohort of 260 patients who underwent operative resection for PC. RESULTS: By specifically assessing the subgroup of patients with detectable CA19.9, we identified potential utility at key clinical decision points. Low postoperative CA19.9 at 3 months (median survival 25.6 vs 14.8 months, P=0.0052) and before adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Patients with postoperative CA 19.9 levels>90 U/ml did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.7194) compared with those with a CA19.9 of ≤90 U/ml (median 26.0 vs 16.7 months, P=0.0108). Normalization of CA19.9 within 6 months of resection was also an independent favorable prognostic factor (median 29.9 vs 14.8 months, P=0.0004) and normal perioperative CA19.9 levels identified a good prognostic group, which was associated with a 5-year survival of 42%. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative serum CA19.9 measurements are informative in patients with detectable CA19.9 (defined by serum levels of >5 U/ml) and have potential clinical utility in predicting outcome and response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Future clinical trials should prioritize incorporation of CA19.9 measurement at key decision points to prospectively validate these findings and facilitate implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer
Collisson, E. A., Bailey, P., Chang, D. K., & Biankin, A. V. (2019) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0109-y · Cited by 892
Self-citationRoles of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer: Biomarker, predictor and promoter
Luo, G., Jin, K., Deng, S., Cheng, H., Fan, Z., Gong, Y., Qian, Y., Huang, Q., Ni, Q., Liu, C., et al. (2021) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188409 · Cited by 446
The Clinical Utility of CA 19-9 in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Diagnostic and Prognostic Updates
E. Poruk, K., Z. Gay, D., Brown, K., D. Mulvihill, J., M. Boucher, K., L. Scaife, C., A. Firpo, M., & J. Mulvihill, S. (2013) · Current Molecular Medicine · doi:10.2174/1566524011313030003 · Cited by 398
Hartwig, W., Strobel, O., Hinz, U., Fritz, S., Hackert, T., Roth, C., Büchler, M. W., & Werner, J. (2013) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2809-1 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Humphris, J. L., Chang, D. K., Johns, A. L., Scarlett, C. J., Pajic, M., Jones, M. D., Colvin, E. K., Nagrial, A., Chin, V. T., Chantrill, L. A., Samra, J. S., Gill, A. J., Kench, J. G., Merrett, N. D., Das, A., Musgrove, E. A., Sutherland, R. L., & Biankin, A. V.
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1713-1722
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136339108
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prognostic and predictive value of serum CA19.9 in pancreatic cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdr561
- The paper
- Humphris, J. L., Chang, D. K., Johns, A. L., Scarlett, C. J., Pajic, M., Jones, M. D., Colvin, E. K., Nagrial, A., Chin, V. T., Chantrill, L. A., Samra, J. S., Gill, A. J., Kench, J. G., Merrett, N. D., Das, A., Musgrove, E. A., Sutherland, R. L., & Biankin, A. V. (2012). The prognostic and predictive value of serum CA19.9 in pancreatic cancer. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.