Cited by 464Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Final overall survival results from a randomised, phase III study of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802)

Open access
Zhou, C., Wu, Y.L., Chen, G., Feng, J., Liu, X.-Q., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, J. +16 more·2015·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background The OPTIMAL study was the first study to compare efficacy and tolerability of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib, versus standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Findings from final overall survival (OS) analysis and assessment of post-study treatment impact are presented.Patients and methods Of 165 randomised patients, 82 received erlotinib and 72 gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Final OS analyses were conducted when 70% of deaths had occurred in the intent-to-treat population. Subgroup OS was analysed by Cox proportional hazards model and included randomisation stratification factors and post-study treatments.Results Median OS was similar between the erlotinib (22.8 months) and chemotherapy (27.2 months) arms with no significant between-group differences in the overall population [hazard ratio (HR), 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.71; P = 0.2663], the exon 19 deletion subpopulation (HR, 1.52; 95% CI 0.91-2.52; P = 0.1037) or the exon 21 L858 mutation subpopulation (HR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.55-1.54; P = 0.7392). More patients in the erlotinib arm versus the chemotherapy arm did not receive any post-study treatment (36.6% versus 22.2%). Patients who received sequential combination of EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy had significantly improved OS compared with those who received EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy only (29.7 versus 20.7 or 11.2 months, respectively; P < 0.0001). OS was significantly shorter in patients who did not receive post-study treatments compared with those who received subsequent treatments in both arms.Conclusion The significant OS benefit observed in patients treated with EGFR-TKI emphasises its contribution to improving survival of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients, suggesting that erlotinib should be considered standard first-line treatment of EGFR mutant patients and EGFR-TKI treatment following first-line therapy also brings significant benefits to those patients.Clinicaltrialsgov identifier NCT00874419.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdv276

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, C., Wu, Y. L., Chen, G., Feng, J., Liu, X.-Q., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Zhou, S., Ren, S., Lu, S., Zhang, L., Hu, C., Hu, C., Luo, Y., Chen, L., Ye, M., Huang, J., Zhi, X., Zhang, Y., Xiu, Q., Ma, J., Zhang, L., & You, C.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Guangdong General Hospital (CN)
  • Harbin Medical University (CN)
  • Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN)
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN)
  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Second Military Medical University (CN)
  • Nanfang Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhou, C.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1877-1883
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2210071992
Cited by
464
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 2
FWCI
42.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche (No. 06DZ19502)
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
erlotinib, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, first-line therapy, overall survival, exon 19 deletion, OPTIMAL trial
MeSH terms
Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gemcitabine, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Deoxycytidine, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Survival Analysis, Carboplatin, Treatment Outcome, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review