Final overall survival results from a randomised, phase III study of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802)
Open accessAbstract
Background The OPTIMAL study was the first study to compare efficacy and tolerability of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib, versus standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Findings from final overall survival (OS) analysis and assessment of post-study treatment impact are presented.Patients and methods Of 165 randomised patients, 82 received erlotinib and 72 gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Final OS analyses were conducted when 70% of deaths had occurred in the intent-to-treat population. Subgroup OS was analysed by Cox proportional hazards model and included randomisation stratification factors and post-study treatments.Results Median OS was similar between the erlotinib (22.8 months) and chemotherapy (27.2 months) arms with no significant between-group differences in the overall population [hazard ratio (HR), 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.71; P = 0.2663], the exon 19 deletion subpopulation (HR, 1.52; 95% CI 0.91-2.52; P = 0.1037) or the exon 21 L858 mutation subpopulation (HR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.55-1.54; P = 0.7392). More patients in the erlotinib arm versus the chemotherapy arm did not receive any post-study treatment (36.6% versus 22.2%). Patients who received sequential combination of EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy had significantly improved OS compared with those who received EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy only (29.7 versus 20.7 or 11.2 months, respectively; P < 0.0001). OS was significantly shorter in patients who did not receive post-study treatments compared with those who received subsequent treatments in both arms.Conclusion The significant OS benefit observed in patients treated with EGFR-TKI emphasises its contribution to improving survival of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients, suggesting that erlotinib should be considered standard first-line treatment of EGFR mutant patients and EGFR-TKI treatment following first-line therapy also brings significant benefits to those patients.Clinicaltrialsgov identifier NCT00874419.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cohort's OS from diagnosis was strikingly longer than the 19-28 month median OS reported for first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs.
“a strikingly long survival compared to median OS of 19–28 months with first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs[17–19].”
From Landscape of EGFR-Dependent and -Independent Resistance Mechanisms to Osimertinib and Continuation Therapy Beyond Progression in <i>EGFR</i> -Mutant NSCLC (2018) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261 · see citing works
Self-citationPaclitaxel–Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Sandler, A., Gray, R., Perry, M. C., Brahmer, J., Schiller, J. H., Dowlati, A., Lilenbaum, R., & Johnson, D. H. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061884 · Cited by 5,761 · see citing works
Sequist, L. V., Yang, J. C.-H., Yamamoto, N., O'Byrne, K., Hirsh, V., Mok, T., Geater, S. L., Orlov, S., Tsai, C.-M., Boyer, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806 · Cited by 3,228 · see citing works
Wu, Y.-L., Zhou, C., Hu, C.-P., Feng, J., Lu, S., Huang, Y., Li, W., Hou, M., Shi, J. H., Lee, K. Y., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70604-1 · Cited by 1,978 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, J. C.-H., Wu, Y.-L., Schuler, M., Sebastian, M., Popat, S., Yamamoto, N., Zhou, C., Hu, C.-P., O'Byrne, K., Feng, J., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71173-8 · Cited by 1,574 · cited 3× · see citing works
“These findings should be interpreted cautiously as the crossover rate from chemotherapy to EGFR-TKI at progression was substantially lower (66%) [15] compared with other first-line trials, which have reported crossover rates of up to 96% [6, 13].”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationChen, G., Feng, J., Zhou, C., Wu, Y.-L., Liu, X.-Q., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Zhou, S., Ren, S., et al. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt012 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paz-Ares, L., Tan, E.-H., O’Byrne, K., Zhang, L., Hirsh, V., Boyer, M., Yang, J. C.-H., Mok, T., Lee, K. H., Lu, S., et al. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw611 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Self-citationLe, X., Puri, S., Negrao, M. V., Nilsson, M. B., Robichaux, J., Boyle, T., Hicks, J. K., Lovinger, K. L., Roarty, E., Rinsurongkawong, W., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1542 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Cho, J. H., Lim, S. H., An, H. J., Kim, K. H., Park, K. U., Kang, E. J., Choi, Y. H., Ahn, M. S., Lee, M. H., Sun, J.-M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.00931 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Russo, A., Franchina, T., Ricciardi, G., Battaglia, A., Picciotto, M., & Adamo, V. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20061431 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Girard, N. (2018) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2017-0636 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhou, C., Wu, Y. L., Chen, G., Feng, J., Liu, X.-Q., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Zhou, S., Ren, S., Lu, S., Zhang, L., Hu, C., Hu, C., Luo, Y., Chen, L., Ye, M., Huang, J., Zhi, X., Zhang, Y., Xiu, Q., Ma, J., Zhang, L., & You, C.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- Guangdong General Hospital (CN)
- Harbin Medical University (CN)
- Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (CN)
- Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN)
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN)
- Capital Medical University (CN)
- Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN)
- Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN)
- Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN)
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN)
- Second Military Medical University (CN)
- Nanfang Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1877-1883
- ISSN
- 0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2210071992
- Semantic Scholar
- 754accd10534477b215311e3a11f8bfa53172475
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 42.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche (No. 06DZ19502)
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
- Keywords
- erlotinib, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, first-line therapy, overall survival, exon 19 deletion, OPTIMAL trial
- MeSH terms
- Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gemcitabine, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Deoxycytidine, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Survival Analysis, Carboplatin, Treatment Outcome, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review