Cited by 383Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Risk factors, prevalence, and course of severe fatigue after breast cancer treatment: a meta-analysis involving 12,327 breast cancer survivors

Open access
Abrahams, H.J.G., Gielissen, M.F.M., Schmits, I.C., Verhagen, C.A.H.H.V.M., Rovers, M.M., Knoop, H.·2016·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background This meta-analysis aimed to (i) examine demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related risk factors, (ii) estimate the prevalence, and (iii) describe the course of severe fatigue following breast cancer (BC) treatment.Methods PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception up to 23 November 2015. Risk factors and prevalence rates were analyzed with inverse variance random-effects analyses. Heterogeneity was studied with sensitivity analyses.Results Twenty-seven studies were included (N = 12 327). Breast cancer survivors (BCS) with a partner were at lower risk for severe fatigue than survivors without a partner [risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-0.98]. Survivors with stage II or III cancer, and survivors treated with chemotherapy were at higher risk for severe fatigue than survivors with stage 0 or I cancer and without chemotherapy (RR respectively 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.28; 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19). Survivors treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, and survivors with this combination plus hormone therapy were at higher risk than survivors with other treatment combinations (RR respectively 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.33; 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.66). Survivors treated with surgery and surgery plus radiotherapy were at lower risk than survivors with additional treatments (RR respectively 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.98; 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96). Hormone and targeted therapy were no significant risk factors. The pooled prevalence of severe fatigue was 26.9% (95% CI 23.2-31.0), but this should be interpreted with caution because of high heterogeneity. A relatively large decrease in the prevalence of severe fatigue seemed to occur in the first half year after treatment completion.Conclusions Approximately one in four BCS suffer from severe fatigue. Risk factors of severe fatigue were higher disease stages, chemotherapy and receiving the combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, both with and without hormone therapy. Having a partner, receiving only surgery, and surgery plus radiotherapy decreased the risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdw099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher disease stages, chemotherapy, and receiving the combination of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy with or without hormone therapy are risk factors of severe fatigue in breast cancer survivors; conversely, having a partner, performing surgery alone or surgery plus radiotherapy decreased the risk.

    “A recent meta-analysis (Abrahams et al., 2016) focusing on cancer related fatigue related risk factors identified higher disease stages, CT and receiving the combination of surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and CT with or without hormone therapy (HT) as risk factors of severe fatigue in this population. Conversely, having a partner, performing surgery alone or surgery plus RT decreased the risk.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 383

Authors
Abrahams, H. J. G., Gielissen, M. F. M., Schmits, I. C., Verhagen, C. A. H. H. V. M., Rovers, M. M., & Knoop, H.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Abrahams, H.J.G.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
965-974
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295928384
Cited by
383
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Pink Ribbon (2012.WO26.C139)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, post-treatment fatigue, risk factors, prevalence, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, targeted therapy, stage at diagnosis, marital status, cancer treatment side effects, quality of life, cancer survivorship, psychosocial factors, physical activity, social support, nutrition, cancer-related fatigue
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Breast Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review