Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An update on the management of sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a European Consensus Initiative between Sarcoma PAtients EuroNet (SPAEN) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG)

Open access
Kasper, B., Baumgarten, C., Garcia, J., Bonvalot, S., Haas, R., Haller, F., Hohenberger, P., Penel, N., Messiou, C., van der Graaf, W.T., Gronchi, A., Bauer, S., Blay, J.Y., van Coevorden, F., Dileo, P., Dürr, H.R., Fiore, M., Grünwald, V., Jones, R., Judson, I., Kettelhack, C., Kopeckova, K., Lazar, A., Lindner, L.H., Martin-Broto, J., Rutkowski, P., Stacchiotti, S., Stoeckle, E., Valverde, C., Verhoef, K., Wardelmann, E., Wartenberg, M.·2017·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Desmoid-type fibromatosis is a rare and locally aggressive monoclonal, fibroblastic proliferation characterized by a variable and often unpredictable clinical course. Currently, there is no established or evidence-based treatment approach available for this disease. Therefore, in 2015 the European Desmoid Working Group published a position paper giving recommendations on the treatment of this intriguing disease. Here, we present an update of this consensus approach based on professionals' AND patients' expertise following a round table meeting bringing together sarcoma experts from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group with patients and patient advocates from Sarcoma PAtients EuroNet. In this paper, we focus on new findings regarding the prognostic value of mutational analysis in desmoid-type fibromatosis patients and new systemic treatment options.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdx323

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Kasper, B., Baumgarten, C., Garcia, J., Bonvalot, S., Haas, R., Haller, F., Hohenberger, P., Penel, N., Messiou, C., van der Graaf, W. T., Gronchi, A., Bauer, S., Blay, J. Y., van Coevorden, F., Dileo, P., Dürr, H. R., Fiore, M., Grünwald, V., Jones, R., Judson, I., Kettelhack, C., Kopeckova, K., Lazar, A., Lindner, L. H., Martin-Broto, J., Rutkowski, P., Stacchiotti, S., Stoeckle, E., Valverde, C., Verhoef, K., Wardelmann, E., & Wartenberg, M.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
2399-2408
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2669144980
Cited by
422
References
46
FWCI
27.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An update on the management of sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a European Consensus Initiative between Sarcoma PAtients EuroNet (SPAEN) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdx323
The paper
Kasper, B., Baumgarten, C., Garcia, J., Bonvalot, S., Haas, R., Haller, F., Hohenberger, P., Penel, N., Messiou, C., van der Graaf, W. T., Gronchi, A., Bauer, S., Blay, J. Y., van Coevorden, F., Dileo, P., Dürr, H. R., Fiore, M., Grünwald, V., Jones, R., . . . Wartenberg, M. (2017). An update on the management of sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a European Consensus Initiative between Sarcoma PAtients EuroNet (SPAEN) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG). Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx323

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.